The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Standard methods for maintaining adult Apis mellifera in cages under in vitro laboratory conditions
Open accessAbstract
SummaryAdult honey bees are maintained in vitro in laboratory cages for a variety of purposes. For example, researchers may wish to perform experiments on honey bees caged individually or in groups to study aspects of parasitology, toxicology, or physiology under highly controlled conditions, or they may cage whole frames to obtain newly emerged workers of known age cohorts. Regardless of purpose, researchers must manage a number of variables, ranging from selection of study subjects (e.g. honey bee subspecies) to experimental environment (e.g. temperature and relative humidity). Although decisions made by researchers may not necessarily jeopardize the scientific rigour of an experiment, they may profoundly affect results, and may make comparisons with similar, but independent, studies difficult. Focusing primarily on workers, we provide recommendations for maintaining adults under in vitro laboratory conditions, whilst acknowledging gaps in our understanding that require further attention. We specifically describe how to properly obtain honey bees, and how to choose appropriate cages, incubator conditions, and food to obtain biologically relevant and comparable experimental results. Additionally, we provide broad recommendations for experimental design and statistical analyses of data that arises from experiments using caged honey bees. The ultimate goal of this, and of all COLOSS BEEBOOK papers, is not to stifle science with restrictions, but rather to provide researchers with the appropriate tools to generate comparable data that will build upon our current understanding of honey bees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A., & Smith, G. M. (2009) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6 · Cited by 17,963
Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution
Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., & White, J.-S. S. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 · Cited by 8,910
Crawley, M. J. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,431
Winston, M. L. (1987) · Cited by 2,071
Saturated Solutions For the Control of Humidity in Biological Research
Winston, P. W., & Bates, D. H. (1960) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1931961 · Cited by 1,796
Biogeography and Taxonomy of Honeybees
Ruttner, F. (1988) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-72649-1 · Cited by 1,539
Mullin, C. A., Frazier, M., Frazier, J. L., Ashcraft, S., Simonds, R., vanEngelsdorp, D., & Pettis, J. S. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009754 · Cited by 1,498
vanEngelsdorp, D., & Meixner, M. D. (2010) · Journal of Invertebrate Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.jip.2009.06.011 · Cited by 1,254
Neumann, P., & Carreck, N. L. (2010) · Journal of Apicultural Research · doi:10.3896/ibra.1.49.1.01 · Cited by 1,022
Self-citationDiet effects on honeybee immunocompetence
Alaux, C., Ducloz, F., Crauser, D., & Le Conte, Y. (2010) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0986 · Cited by 843
Self-citation
Cited by
Honeybee gut microbiota promotes host weight gain via bacterial metabolism and hormonal signaling
Zheng, H., Powell, J. E., Steele, M. I., Dietrich, C., & Moran, N. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1701819114 · Cited by 664
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, G. R., Alaux, C., Costa, C., Csáki, T., Doublet, V., Eisenhardt, D., Fries, I., Kuhn, R., McMahon, D. P., Medrzycki, P., Murray, T. E., Natsopoulou, M. E., Neumann, P., Oliver, R., Paxton, R. J., Pernal, S. F., Shutler, D., Tanner, G., van der Steen, J. J. M., & Brodschneider, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Apicultural Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-36
- ISSN
- 0021-8839 (ISSN-L)
- 2078-6913
- OpenAlex
- W2073528755
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 20.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standard methods for maintaining adult Apis mellifera in cages under in vitro laboratory conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3896/ibra.1.52.1.04
- The paper
- Williams, G. R., Alaux, C., Costa, C., Csáki, T., Doublet, V., Eisenhardt, D., Fries, I., Kuhn, R., McMahon, D. P., Medrzycki, P., Murray, T. E., Natsopoulou, M. E., Neumann, P., Oliver, R., Paxton, R. J., Pernal, S. F., Shutler, D., Tanner, G., van der Steen, J. J. M., & Brodschneider, R. (2013). Standard methods for maintaining adult Apis mellifera in cages under in vitro laboratory conditions. Journal of Apicultural Research. https://doi.org/10.3896/ibra.1.52.1.04
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.