Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Activity, abundance and diversity of nitrifying archaea and bacteria in the central California Current

Santoro, Alyson E., Casciotti, Karen L., Francis, Christopher A.·2010·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: A combination of stable isotope and molecular biological approaches was used to determine the activity, abundance and diversity of nitrifying organisms in the central California Current. Using 15 NH 4 + incubations, nitrification was detectable in the upper water column down to 500 m; maximal rates were observed just below the euphotic zone. Crenarchaeal and betaproteobacterial ammonia monooxygenase subunit A genes ( amoA ), and 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes of Marine Group I Crenarchaeota and a putative nitrite‐oxidizing genus, Nitrospina , were quantified using quantitative PCR. Crenarchaeal amoA abundance ranged from three to six genes ml −1 in oligotrophic surface waters to > 8.7 × 10 4 genes ml −1 just below the core of the California Current at 200 m depth. Bacterial amoA abundance was lower than archaeal amoA and ranged from below detection levels to 400 genes ml −1 . Nitrification rates were not directly correlated to bacterial or archaeal amoA abundance. Archaeal amoA and Marine Group I crenarchaeal 16S rRNA gene abundances were correlated with Nitrospina 16S rRNA gene abundance at all stations, indicating that similar factors may control the distribution of these two groups. Putatively shallow water‐associated archaeal amoA types (‘Cluster A’) decreased in relative abundance with depth, while a deep water‐associated amoA type (‘Cluster B’) increased with depth. Although some Cluster B amoA sequences were found in surface waters, expressed amoA gene sequences were predominantly from Cluster A. Cluster B amoA transcripts were detected between 100 and 500 m depths, suggesting an active role in ammonia oxidation in the mesopelagic. Expression of marine Nitrosospira‐ like bacterial amoA genes was detected throughout the euphotic zone down to 200 m. Natural abundance stable isotope ratios (δ 15 N and δ 18 O) in nitrate (NO 3 ‐ ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) were used to evaluate the importance of nitrification over longer time scales. Using an isotope mass balance model, we calculate that nitrification could produce between 0.45 and 2.93 µmol m −2 day −1 N 2 O in the central California Current, or approximately 1.5–4 times the local N 2 O flux from deep water.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02205.x

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

See all 398

Metadata

Authors
Santoro, A. E., Casciotti, K. L., & Francis, C. A.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
1989-2006
ISSN
  • 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-2920
OpenAlex
W1538026004
Cited by
398
References
60
FWCI
28.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activity, abundance and diversity of nitrifying archaea and bacteria in the central California Current. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02205.x
The paper
Santoro, A. E., Casciotti, K. L., & Francis, C. A. (2010). Activity, abundance and diversity of nitrifying archaea and bacteria in the central California Current. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02205.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.