Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Red but not dead? Membranes of stressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae are permeable to propidium iodide

Davey, H. M., Hexley, P.·2011·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Flow cytometric monitoring of propidium iodide (PI) uptake is a well‐established and rapid method for monitoring cell death and is used on the basis that the intact membrane of viable cells excludes the propidium ion and that loss of this permeability barrier represents irreparable damage and thus cell death. These assumptions are typically based on analysis of live and killed cells. Here we have identified stress levels that lead to a loss of viability of a proportion of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells and under these conditions we show that there is a subpopulation of cells that can take up PI during and immediately following exposure to stress but that a short incubation allows repair of the membrane damage such that subsequent exposure to PI does not result in staining. Irrespective of the stress applied, approximately 7% of cells exhibited the ability to repair. These results indicate that the level of damage that the yeast cell membrane can sustain and yet retain the ability to repair is greater than previously recognized and care must therefore be taken in using the terms ‘PI‐positive’ and ‘dead’ synonymously. We discuss these findings in the context of the potential for such environmental stress‐induced, transient membrane permeability to have evolutionary implications via the facilitation of horizontal gene transfer.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02317.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1002/cyto.a.20212 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/cyto.a.20331 · DOI
  3. 10.1128/AAC.01582-05 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1991.tb04662.x · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0302-4598(92)80016-A · DOI
  6. 10.1099/00221287-146-4-877 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/cyto.990110303 · DOI
  8. Davey H.M., 1996, Flow cytometry and cell sorting of heterogeneous microbial populations – the importance of single‐cell analyses, Microbiol Rev, 60, 641, 10.1128/mr.60.4.641-696.1996 · DOI
  9. Davey H.M., 2003, Using flow cytometry to quantify microbial heterogeneity, Curr Issues Mol Biol, 5, 9
  10. Davey H.M., 2004, Current Protocols in Cytometry (Supplement 29), 11.13.11
  11. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19980130)14:2<147::AID-YEA207>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.01.015 · DOI
  13. 10.1128/EC.4.6.1102-1115.2005 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/b93997 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0014-5793(87)80886-4 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/10_2007_073 · DOI
  17. Ito H., 1983, Transformation of intact yeast‐cells treated with alkali cations, J Bacteriol, 153, 163, 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s00018-003-2239-0 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/cyto.990170405 · DOI
  20. Jones R.P., 1987, Measures of yeast death and deactivation and their meaning: parts 1 and 2, Process Biochem, 22, 118
  21. 10.1177/33.1.2578146 · DOI
  22. 10.1128/AEM.62.4.1311-1316.1996 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/978-0-387-09794-7_9 · DOI
  24. 10.1128/AAC.44.4.827-834.2000 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07925.x · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0580-9517(08)70149-1 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.03.017 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Davey, H. M., & Hexley, P.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
163-171
ISSN
  • 1462-2912
  • 1462-2920
Cited by
219
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Red but not dead? Membranes of stressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae are permeable to propidium iodide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02317.x
The paper
Davey, H. M., & Hexley, P. (2011). Red but not dead? Membranes of stressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae are permeable to propidium iodide. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02317.x