The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors
Abstract
Objective The study aimed to identify risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage (AL) after anterior resection for rectal cancer in a consecutive national cohort. Method All patients with an initial first diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma were prospectively registered in a national database. The register included 1495 patients who had had a curative anterior resection between May 2001 and December 2004. The association of a number of patient‐ and procedure‐related factors with clinical AL after anterior resection was analysed in a cohort design. Results Anastomotic leakages occurred in 163 (11%) patients. In a multivariate analysis, the risk of AL was significantly increased in patients with tumours located below 10 cm from the anal verge if no faecal diversion was undertaken (OR 5.37 5 cm (tumour level from anal verge), 95% CI 2.10–13.7, OR 3.57 7 cm, CI 1.81–7.07 and OR 1.96 10 cm, CI 1.22–3.10), in male patients (OR 2.36, CI 1.18–4.71), in smokers (OR 1.88, CI 1.02–3.46), and perioperative bleeding (OR 1.05 for intervals of 100 ml blood loss, CI 1.02–1.07). Conclusion Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for low rectal tumours is related to the level, male gender, smoking and perioperative bleeding. Faecal diversion is advisable after total mesorectal excision of low rectal tumours in order to prevent AL.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matthiessen, P., Hallböök, O., Rutegård, J., Simert, G., & Sjödahl, R. (2007) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3180603024 · Cited by 1,123
Cited by
Sørensen, L. T. (2012) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.5 · Cited by 645
Pommergaard, H. ‐., Gessler, B., Burcharth, J., Angenete, E., Haglind, E., & Rosenberg, J. (2014) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/codi.12618 · Cited by 253
Riiskjær, M., Forman, A., Kesmodel, U. S., Andersen, L. M., Ljungmann, K., & Seyer-Hansen, M. (2018) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1097/dcr.0000000000000970 · Cited by 46
Robotic treatment of bowel endometriosis
Hur, C., & Falcone, T. (2021) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.05.012 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertelsen, C. A., Andreasen, A. H., Jørgensen, T., Harling, H., & on behalf of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group
- Venue
- Colorectal Disease
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12-08
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-43
- ISSN
- 1462-8910 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-1318
- OpenAlex
- W1551089208
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01711.x
- The paper
- Bertelsen, C. A., Andreasen, A. H., Jørgensen, T., Harling, H., & on behalf of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. (2010). Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Colorectal Disease. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01711.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.