Cited by 49Evolution and Paleontology StudiesEvolution and Genetic DynamicsMorphological variations and asymmetry

The origin of higher taxa: macroevolutionary processes, and the case of the mammals

Kemp, T. S.·2007·Acta Zoologica

Abstract

Abstract The origin of a new higher taxon is characterized by a long‐term phylogenetic trend, involving evolutionary changes in a large number of characters. At this phylogenetic level, the conflict between internal integration of the phenotype and its evolvability can be resolved by the correlated progression model, in which many disparate traits evolve by a sequence of small increments in loose correlation with one another, rather than by the modularity model. The trend leading to the new higher taxon implies the existence of a long ridge in an adaptive landscape. An evolutionary lineage tracking it requires adaptive changes in broad biological characteristics, involving many traits. Species selection is a possible additional driver of the trend. These conclusions are tested against the synapsid fossil record of the origin of mammals. The reconstructed sequence of acquisition of mammalian traits supports the correlated progression model. The adaptive ridge involved is postulated to have been a sequence of overlapping niches requiring increasing ability to remain active in daily and seasonally fluctuating environments by means of increasing internal regulation. An inferred speciation bias in favour of relatively small, relatively more progressive carnivores indicates that species selection was also involved in driving the trend. Palaeoenvironmental evidence indicates that ecological opportunity probably played a role at certain points along the lineage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2007.00248.x

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The expectation of morphological novelty differs depending on the specific drivers of an individual adaptive radiation.

    “Thus, the expectation of morphological novelty differs depending on the specific drivers of an individual adaptive radiation [74–80].”

    From Novelty and Innovation in the History of Life (2015) · cites this paper as [79]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kemp, T. S.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Kemp, T. S.
Venue
Acta Zoologica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-12-15
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
3-22
ISSN
  • 0001-7272 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-6395
OpenAlex
W2106540379
Cited by
49
References
104
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Acta Zoologica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
macroevolution, mammals, synapsids, fitness landscape, species selection, phylogenetic trends, ecological opportunity, carnivores, fossil record, paleoenvironment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review