Cited by 131Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployment and Welfare StudiesEmployment, Labor, and Gender Studies

Work Attitudes and Emotional Responses of Permanent, Voluntary, and Involuntary Temporary-help Employees: An Exploratory Study

Krausz, Moshe, Brandwein, Tamar, Fox, Shaul·1995·Applied Psychology

Abstract

On souhaite, avec cette recherche, compléter les travaux empiriques encore rares concernant l'impact du travail intérimaire sur les salarids concerned. On a comparé un échantillon de 90 intérimaires à un autre échantillon composé de 134 titulaires pour ce qui est de l'implication dans le travail, de la satisfaction professionnelle et du stress. Conformément au schema theorique et aux hypothèses opératoires issus de leurs propres déclarations, les intérimaires ont été séparés en deux sous‐groupes sur la base du (non) volontariat pour cette forme de travail. Une analyse de variance multivariée (MANOVA) et une analyse de covariance multivariée (MANCOVA) ont mis en évidence des différences significatives au niveau de la satisfaction, mais pas de la motivation, ni du stress lié au rôle. The current research is an attempt to extend the scant empirical literature addressing the impact of the temporary‐help work arrangement on the temporary‐help employees (THEs) employed under that arrangement. A sample of 90 THEs was compared to a sample of 134 permanent employees with respect to work involvement, work satisfaction, and stress measures. In accordance with the conceptual framework and the operational hypotheses that were derived and based on their own statements, THEs were divided into those who work on that arrangement voluntarily as opposed to those who worked as THEs involuntarily. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) reveale…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1995.tb01077.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals who voluntarily choose to become temporary workers reveal higher levels of work satisfaction than those whose choices were involuntary.

    “In fact, individuals who voluntarily choose to become temporary workers reveal higher levels of work satisfaction when compared with those whose choices were involuntary [49,50].”

    From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [50]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krausz, M., Brandwein, T., & Fox, S.
Affiliations
Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Corresponding author
Krausz, Moshe
Venue
Applied Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-07
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
217-232
ISSN
  • 0269-994X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0597
OpenAlex
W1984655422
Cited by
131
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
Keywords
temporary agency work, work attitudes, job satisfaction, job involvement, role stress, permanent employees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review