The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drivers and barriers to seeking treatment for erectile dysfunction: a comparison of six countries
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of treatment-seeking behaviour in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and the predictors (correlates) of individual drivers and barriers to seeking treatment. Although the prevalence and epidemiology of ED have been reviewed, there is little information about the treatment-seeking behaviour of men with this disorder. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Data from the Cross-National Survey on Male Health Issues conducted between March and September 2000 were assessed by multivariate analysis. A cohort of 32 644 men aged 20-75 years was recruited during visits to their physicians. The men completed a short screening questionnaire, covering their overall health, and prostate, urinary and erectile problems. Men identified as having ED completed a detailed follow-up questionnaire. Logistic regression methods were used to identify predictors of treatment-seeking behaviour, and individual drivers and barriers to seeking treatment. RESULTS: Most men with ED had not sought treatment. The analyses suggested that ED, in conjunction with a desire to have sex, was necessary for men to seek treatment. Men seeking treatment commonly identified themselves as self-motivated or that they were influenced by a spouse or sex partner. The youngest group (20-39 years) was least likely to seek treatment. Among those who did not seek treatment, younger men were likely to believe that their ED would resolve spontaneously, whereas older men resisted seeking treatment because they felt that ED was a natural part of ageing. CONCLUSIONS: The data from this survey of men using the healthcare system confirmed other population-based reports that a minority of men with ED seek treatment. Subset analyses showed that treatment-seeking behaviour tended to be driven primarily by the man or by his sex partner. Common barriers to seeking treatment included the belief that ED would resolve spontaneously (younger men) and that ED was a normal part of ageing (older men).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research has identified several barriers to seeking treatment for ED. In addition to feeling embarrassed, communication problems between partners, low self-confidence, self and partner blaming, and feeling older, also inaccurate information and limited understanding of ED may prevent men and their partners from seeking help.59,96,97”
From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [97]
In the citing paper
“Indicators for seeking treatment, on the other hand, are desire to have sex, duration of the condition, partner insistence, awareness of treatment options, and affordability of treatment.96,97”
From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [97]
Citations
Cites
Rosen, R. C., Riley, A., Wagner, G., Osterloh, I. H., Kirkpatrick, J., & Mishra, A. (1997) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00238-0 · Cited by 5,849
Sexual Dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and Predictors
Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.6.537 · Cited by 5,119
Self-citationImpotence and Its Medical and Psychosocial Correlates: Results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study
Feldman, H. A., Goldstein, I., Hatzichristou, D. G., Krane, R. J., & McKinlay, J. B. (1994) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)34871-1 · Cited by 5,074
Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking
Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.5 · Cited by 2,761
Aytaç, Mckinlay, & Krane (1999) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00142.x · Cited by 1,341
Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: results of the ‘Cologne Male Survey’
Braun, M., Wassmer, G., Klotz, T., Reifenrath, B., Mathers, M. J., & Engelmann, U. H. (2000) · International Journal of Impotence Research · doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3900622 · Cited by 996
Bacon, C. G., Mittleman, M. A., Kawachi, I., Giovannucci, E., Glasser, D. B., & Rimm, E. B. (2003) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-139-3-200308050-00005 · Cited by 832
Nicolosi, A., Moreira, E. D., Shirai, M., Ismail Bin Mohd Tambi, M., & Glasser, D. B. (2003) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02102-7 · Cited by 499
The worldwide prevalence and epidemiology of erectile dysfunction
McKinlay, J. B. (2000) · International Journal of Impotence Research · doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3900567 · Cited by 435
Sexual problems: a study of the prevalence and need for health care in the general population
Dunn, K. M. (1998) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/15.6.519 · Cited by 387
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Holyrod KA, 2000, Sex, Gender and Pain: from Progress in Pain Research and Management.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fisher, W. A., Rosen, R. C., Eardley, I., Sand, M., & Goldstein, I. (2005) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.00118.x · Cited by 335
The Psychological Burden of Premature Ejaculation
Rowland, D. L., Patrick, D. L., Rothman, M. L., & Gagnon, D. D. (2007) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.025 · Cited by 228
Canada, A. L., Neese, L. E., Sui, D., & Schover, L. R. (2005) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.21537 · Cited by 217
Abraham, L., Symonds, T. L., & Morris, M. F. (2008) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00749.x · Cited by 182
Health issues of men: prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction
SHABSIGH, R., PERELMAN, M. A., LOCKHART, D. C., LUE, T. F., & BRODERICK, G. A. (2005) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000165389.73148.d1 · Cited by 126
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shabsigh, R., Perelman, M. A., Laumann, E. O., & Lockhart, D. C.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Weill Cornell Medical Center (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shabsigh, Ridwan
- ORCID
- Perelman, Michael A.
- Venue
- BJU International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1055-1065
- ISSN
- 1464-4096 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-410X
- OpenAlex
- W2025162207
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Male Reproductive Health Studies
- Keywords
- erectile dysfunction, treatment-seeking behavior, barriers to treatment, male sexual health, age differences, partner influence, cross-national comparison
- MeSH terms
- Europe, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, United States, Prevalence, Age Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review