The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chronic painful peripheral neuropathy in an urban community: a controlled comparison of people with and without diabetes
Abstract
Aims A cross‐sectional study has been performed in order to estimate the prevalence, severity, and current treatment of chronic painful peripheral neuropathy (CPPN) in people with diabetes in the community. Methods Using a structured questionnaire and examination we have assessed these factors in a community sample of people with diabetes (n = 350) and compared them with 344 age‐ and sex‐matched people without diabetes from the same locality. Results The prevalence of CPPN was estimated to be 16.2%[95% confidence interval (CI): 6.8–16%] in people with diabetes compared with 4.9% (95% CI: 2.6–7.2%) in the control sample (P < 0.0001). Diabetic subjects with and without CPPN did not differ in age, sex, type and duration of diabetes, body mass index, smoking status and glycaemic control. However, CPPN diabetic subjects had significantly higher Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for pain over the preceding 24 h [median (interquartile range) 3.5 (1.5–6.7) cm vs. 0.7 (0–3.9) cm, P < 0.0001]. Also, the total McGill Pain Questionnaire Score (a measure of pain quality and severity) was 18 (13–31.5) vs. 10 (4–16) (P < 0.0001). Of patients with diabetes and CPPN, 12.5% (7/56) had never reported their symptoms to their treating physician and 39.3% (22/56) had never received any treatment for their painful symptoms. Conclusions CPPN is common, often severe but frequently unreported and inadequately treated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Young, M. J., Boulton, A. J. M., Macleod, A. F., Williams, D. R. R., & Sonksen, P. H. (1993) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/bf00400697 · Cited by 1,502
Tesfaye, S., Stevens, L. K., Stephenson, J. M., Fuller, J. H., Plater, M., Ionescu-Tirgoviste, C., Nuber, A., Pozza, G., & Ward, J. D. (1996) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s001250050586 · Cited by 695
Cited by
Diabetic neuropathy: A position statement by the American Diabetes Association
Pop-Busui, R., Boulton, A. J. M., Feldman, E. L., Bril, V., Freeman, R., Malik, R. A., Sosenko, J. M., & Ziegler, D. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-2042 · Cited by 2,602
Abbott, C. A., Malik, R. A., van Ross, E. R. E., Kulkarni, J., & Boulton, A. J. M. (2011) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc11-1108 · Cited by 868
The Prevalence, Severity, and Impact of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes
Davies, M., Brophy, S., Williams, R., & Taylor, A. (2006) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc05-2228 · Cited by 746
Bril, V., England, J., Franklin, G. M., Backonja, M., Cohen, J., Del Toro, D., Feldman, E., Iverson, D. J., Perkins, B., Russell, J. W., et al. (2011) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182166ebe · Cited by 634
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia
Lunn, M. P., Hughes, R. A., & Wiffen, P. J. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007115.pub3 · Cited by 565
Metadata
- Authors
- Daousi, C., MacFarlane, I. A., Woodward, A., Nurmikko, T. J., Bundred, P. E., & Benbow, S. J.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08-18
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 976-982
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W1814020593
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chronic painful peripheral neuropathy in an urban community: a controlled comparison of people with and without diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01271.x
- The paper
- Daousi, C., MacFarlane, I. A., Woodward, A., Nurmikko, T. J., Bundred, P. E., & Benbow, S. J. (2004). Chronic painful peripheral neuropathy in an urban community: a controlled comparison of people with and without diabetes. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01271.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.