Cited by 1,502Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

A multicentre study of the prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the United Kingdom hospital clinic population

Open access
Young, M. J., Boulton, A. J. M., Macleod, A. F., Williams, D. R. R., Sonksen, P. H.·1993·Diabetologia

Abstract

A cross-sectional multicentre study of randomly selected diabetic patients was performed using a standardised questionnaire and examination, to establish the prevalence of peripheral neuropathy in patients attending 118 hospital diabetes clinics in the UK. Vibration perception threshold was performed in two centres to compare with the clinical scoring systems. A total of 6487 diabetic patients were studied. 53.9% male, median age 59 years (range 18-90 years). 37.4% Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, with a median duration of diabetes 8 years (0-62 years). The overall prevalence of neuropathy was 28.5% (27.4-29.6%) (95% confidence interval) in this population. The prevalence in Type 1 diabetic patients was 22.7% (21.0-24.4%) and in Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients it was 32.1% (30.6-33.6%). The prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy increased with age, from 5% (3.1-6.9%) in the 20-29 year age group to 44.2% (41.1-47.3%) in the 70-79 year age group. Neuropathy was associated with duration of diabetes, and was present in 20.8% (19.1-22.5%) of patients with diabetes duration less than 5 years and in 36.8% (34.9-38.7%) of those with diabetes duration greater than 10 years. Mean vibration perception threshold measured at the great toe was 21.1 +/- 13.5 SD volts and correlated with the neuropathy disability score, r = 0.8 p < 0.001. In conclusion, diabetic peripheral neuropathy is a common complication associated with diabetes. It increases with both age and duration of diabetes, until it is present in more than 50% of Type 2 diabetic patients aged over 60 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00400697

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy affects 50% of patients with diabetes.

    “Diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy (also known as diabetic neuropathy) affects 50% of patients with diabetes [3–5]”

    From A Consideration of the Psychological Aspects to Managing Patients with Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: An Insight into Pain Management Services at a Tertiary Centre in the UK (2021) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Prevalence data section reports 28.5% among the UK hospital-clinic patients studied, not 50%. The Discussion says prevalence exceeds 50% only for Type 2 patients over age 60 attending a hospital clinic; the claim omits that restriction. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In BARI 2D, participants-especially men-treated with insulin sensitizers had a lower 4-year incidence of DPN than those given insulin or sulfonylureas.

    “For example, participants, particularly men, in the BARI 2D trial treated with insulin sensitizers had a lower incidence of DPN over 4 years than those treated with insulin/SUs.570”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [570]

    The Subjects and methods and Prevalence data sections describe a cross-sectional survey of UK hospital-clinic patients, not a four-year treatment comparison. Searches for BARI 2D, insulin sensitizers, and four-year neuropathy incidence found no passage addressing the attributed result. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, M. J., Boulton, A. J. M., Macleod, A. F., Williams, D. R. R., & Sonksen, P. H.
Affiliations
  • Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB)
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
1993-02
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
150-154
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W1984637736
Cited by
1,502
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 56
FWCI
11.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
diabetic peripheral neuropathy, prevalence, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, vibration perception threshold, neuropathy disability score, diabetes duration, age-related risk
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Neuropathies, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatient Clinics, Hospital, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Prevalence, Foot Ulcer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review