The effect of obesity on glycaemic response to metformin or sulphonylureas in Type 2 diabetes
Abstract
AIMS: In treating Type 2 diabetes (T2DM), UK guidelines recommend metformin in obese and overweight patients, and either sulphonylureas or metformin in normal weight patients. Although other factors influence prescribing choice, a key objective in treating T2DM is to lower plasma glucose. There is little data on how glycaemic response to oral agents varies with body mass index (BMI). Therefore, we assessed current prescribing practice and effect of BMI on glycaemic response to sulphonylureas and metformin in a large population T2DM cohort. METHODS: BMI was determined in 3856 T2DM patients on sulphonylurea or metformin monotherapy in 2001-2002. Patients were identified from the Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside, Scotland (DARTS) database. In a linear regression, the effect of BMI and other confounders on drug response was assessed in 2064 treatment-naïve patients commencing sulphonylureas or metformin between 1994 and 2002. RESULTS: In 2001-2002, metformin was more likely to be used in obese than non-obese patients: 13% normal weight, 33.6% overweight and 62.1% obese patients were treated with metformin. Glycaemic response to sulphonylureas was not influenced by BMI (P = 0.81). Metformin was more effective in lowering glucose in those with a lower BMI (r = -0.02, P = 0.02), although the clinical impact of this was small. The HbA(1c) reduction in non-obese patients was similar to that in obese patients (1.46% vs. 1.34%, P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Glycaemic response to metformin in non-obese and obese patients is similar, suggesting that an individual's BMI should not influence the choice of oral agent. Given the non-glycaemia-related benefits of metformin, it should be used in more non-obese patients than is current practice in Tayside, Scotland.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Males responded better to sulfonylurea treatment compared with women.
“For example, males responded better to sulfonylurea treatment compared with women [80] and responders to rosiglitazone were more likely to be females than males [81].”
From Sex differences in metabolic homeostasis, diabetes, and obesity (2015) · cites this paper as [80]
Cites
Mechanism of metformin action in obese and lean noninsulin-dependent diabetic subjects
DEFRONZO, R. A., BARZILAI, N., & SIMONSON, D. C. (1991) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-73-6-1294 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shin, N.-R., Lee, J.-C., Lee, H.-Y., Kim, M.-S., Whon, T. W., Lee, M.-S., & Bae, J.-W. (2014) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303839 · Cited by 1,550 · see citing works
Sex differences in metabolic homeostasis, diabetes, and obesity
Mauvais-Jarvis, F. (2015) · Biology of Sex Differences · doi:10.1186/s13293-015-0033-y · Cited by 626 · see citing works
“example, males responded better to sulfonylurea treatment compared with women [80] and responders to rosi-”
BackgroundMetformin therapy and clinical uses
Scarpello, J. H., & Howlett, H. C. (2008) · Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research · doi:10.3132/dvdr.2008.027 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Vaag, A., & Lund, S. S. (2007) · Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism · doi:10.1139/h07-100 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Shi, Z., Lei, H., Chen, G., Yuan, P., Cao, Z., Ser, H.-L., Zhu, X., Wu, F., Liu, C., Dong, M., et al. (2021) · mSystems · doi:10.1128/msystems.00985-20 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Ito, H., Ishida, H., Takeuchi, Y., Antoku, S., Abe, M., Mifune, M., & Togane, M. (2010) · Nutrition & Metabolism · doi:10.1186/1743-7075-7-83 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Lund, S. S., Tarnow, L., Frandsen, M., Nielsen, B. B., Hansen, B. V., Pedersen, O., Parving, H.-H., & Vaag, A. A. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b4324 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Esfahanian, F., Zamani, M. M., Heshmat, R., & Moini nia, F. (2013) · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.02051.x · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Donnelly, L. A., Doney, A. S. F., Hattersley, A. T., Morris, A. D., & Pearson, E. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Dundee (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pearson, E. R.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-26
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 128-133
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2147804662
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, obesity, body mass index, metformin, sulfonylureas, glycemic response, HbA1c, prescribing patterns, oral antidiabetic drugs, drug response
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Obesity, Prospective Studies, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Time Factors, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review