Cited by 88Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

The effect of obesity on glycaemic response to metformin or sulphonylureas in Type 2 diabetes

Donnelly, L. A., Doney, A. S. F., Hattersley, A. T., Morris, A. D., Pearson, E. R.·2006·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

AIMS: In treating Type 2 diabetes (T2DM), UK guidelines recommend metformin in obese and overweight patients, and either sulphonylureas or metformin in normal weight patients. Although other factors influence prescribing choice, a key objective in treating T2DM is to lower plasma glucose. There is little data on how glycaemic response to oral agents varies with body mass index (BMI). Therefore, we assessed current prescribing practice and effect of BMI on glycaemic response to sulphonylureas and metformin in a large population T2DM cohort. METHODS: BMI was determined in 3856 T2DM patients on sulphonylurea or metformin monotherapy in 2001-2002. Patients were identified from the Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside, Scotland (DARTS) database. In a linear regression, the effect of BMI and other confounders on drug response was assessed in 2064 treatment-naïve patients commencing sulphonylureas or metformin between 1994 and 2002. RESULTS: In 2001-2002, metformin was more likely to be used in obese than non-obese patients: 13% normal weight, 33.6% overweight and 62.1% obese patients were treated with metformin. Glycaemic response to sulphonylureas was not influenced by BMI (P = 0.81). Metformin was more effective in lowering glucose in those with a lower BMI (r = -0.02, P = 0.02), although the clinical impact of this was small. The HbA(1c) reduction in non-obese patients was similar to that in obese patients (1.46% vs. 1.34%, P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Glycaemic response to metformin in non-obese and obese patients is similar, suggesting that an individual's BMI should not influence the choice of oral agent. Given the non-glycaemia-related benefits of metformin, it should be used in more non-obese patients than is current practice in Tayside, Scotland.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01755.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Males responded better to sulfonylurea treatment compared with women.

    “For example, males responded better to sulfonylurea treatment compared with women [80] and responders to rosiglitazone were more likely to be females than males [81].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donnelly, L. A., Doney, A. S. F., Hattersley, A. T., Morris, A. D., & Pearson, E. R.
Affiliations
University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
Pearson, E. R.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-26
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
128-133
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2147804662
Cited by
88
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, obesity, body mass index, metformin, sulfonylureas, glycemic response, HbA1c, prescribing patterns, oral antidiabetic drugs, drug response
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Obesity, Prospective Studies, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Time Factors, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review