Cited by 70

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Needle exchange as a safe haven in an unsafe world

MACNEIL, JOAN, PAULY, BERNADETTE·2011·Drug and Alcohol Review

Abstract

Introduction and aims The purpose of this paper is to describe the meaning of needle exchange programs from the perspectives of users who access such programs. Design and methods We conducted observations, 33 semistructured interviews and two focus groups with users at four needle exchange sites. Qualitative description was used to analyse the data. Results Participants described experiences of trauma, abuse, violence and physical injuries that had damaged their lives and led to the use of drugs to numb the pain. Respect for persons and the development of trust with outreach staff for clients who use injecting drugs supported clients to feel safe in what for many was an unsafe world. Participants described the important role that needle exchange services play in reducing and countering negative stigma, as well as in providing access to clean supplies and to other services. Discussion and conclusions The findings attest to the benefits of having trusted, safe needle exchange services that not only reduce risk behaviours that prevent infections, such as HIV and hepatitis C, but also open the door to other services. This finding is particularly important given that the majority of those interviewed were homeless and living in poverty. The need for both fixed sites and the integration of harm reduction services as part of a broader network of primary health-care services was reinforced.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00188.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Wodak, 2005, Effectiveness of sterile needle and syringe programmes, Int J Drug Policy, 168, S31, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.02.004 · DOI
  2. Bastos, 2000, Evaluating effectiveness of syringe exchange programmes: current issues and future prospects, Soc Sci Med, 51, 1771, 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00109-X · DOI
  3. Bastos, 2000, Evaluating effectiveness of syringe exchange programs: current issues and future prospects, Soc Sci Med, 51, 1771, 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00109-X · DOI
  4. World Health Organization International Collaborative Group, 1994, Multi-city study on drug injecting and risk of HIV infection. (WHO/PSA/94.4)
  5. Hankins, 1997, Needle exchange: panacea or problem?, Can Med Assoc J, 157, 275
  6. Gold, 1997, Needle exchange programs: an economic evaluation of a local experience, Can Med Assoc J, 157, 255
  7. Strathdee, 1997, Needle exchange is not enough: lessons from the Vancouver injecting drug use study, AIDS, 11, F59, 10.1097/00002030-199708000-00001 · DOI
  8. Strathdee, 2006, Facilitating entry into drug treatment among injection drug users referred from a needle exchange program: results from a community-based behavioral intervention trial, Drug Alcohol Depend, 83, 225, 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.11.015 · DOI
  9. Heimer, 1998, Can NEX serve as a conduit to substance abuse treatment?, J Subst Abuse Treat, 15, 183, 10.1016/S0740-5472(97)00220-1 · DOI
  10. Masson, 2007, Hospital- versus community-based syringe exchange: a randomized controlled trial, AIDS Educ Prev, 19, 97, 10.1521/aeap.2007.19.2.97 · DOI
  11. Broadhead, 1999, Termination of an established needle exchange: a study of claims and their impact, Soc Probl, 46, 48, 10.1525/sp.1999.46.1.03x0241g · DOI
  12. Strike, 2004, Finding a place for needle exchange programs, Crit Public Health, 14, 261, 10.1080/09581590400004386 · DOI
  13. Buchanan, 2003, Empirical science meets moral panic: an analysis of the politics of needle exchange, J Public Health Policy, 24, 427, 10.2307/3343386 · DOI
  14. Delgado, 2004, Evaluation of needle exchange programs, Public Health Nurs, 21, 171, 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2004.021211.x · DOI
  15. Takahashi, 1997, The socio-spatial stigmatization of homeless and HIV/ADS: towards an explanation of the nimby syndrome, Soc Sci Med, 45, 903, 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00432-7 · DOI
  16. Canales, 2000, Othering: toward an understanding of difference, ANS Adv Nurs Sci, 22, 16, 10.1097/00012272-200006000-00003 · DOI
  17. Tammi, 2007, How the harm reduction movement contrasts itself against punitive punishment, Int J Drug Policy, 18, 84, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.11.003 · DOI
  18. Miller, 2001, A critical review of the harm minimization ideology in Australia, Crit Public Health, 11, 167, 10.1080/09581590110039865 · DOI
  19. Fischer, 2004, Drug use, risk and urban order: examining supervised injection sites (SISs) as ‘governmentality’, Int J Drug Policy, 15, 357, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2004.04.002 · DOI
  20. Bourgois, 2002, Anthropology and epidemology on drugs: the challenges of cross-methodology and theoretical change, Int J Drug Policy, 13, 259, 10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00115-9 · DOI
  21. MacNeil, 2008, Reaching out: evaluating outreach and needle exchange services on Vancouver Island
  22. MacNeil, Losing ground: closure of a fixed site NEX, Harm Reduct J
  23. Sullivan-Bolyai, 2005, Developing and refining interventions in persons with health disparities: the use of qualitative description, Nurs Outlook, 53, 127, 10.1016/j.outlook.2005.03.005 · DOI
  24. Sandelowski, 2000, Whatever happened to qualitative description?, Res Nurs Health, 23, 334, 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  25. Butters, 2003, Meeting the health care needs of female crack users: a Canadian example, Women Health, 37, 1, 10.1300/J013v37n03_01 · DOI
  26. Sherman, 2001, Point defiance: a case study of the United States' first public needle exchange in Tacoma, Washington, Int J Drug Policy, 12, 45, 10.1016/S0955-3959(00)00074-8 · DOI
  27. Lee, 2009, Demarginalizing the marginalized in substance abuse treatment: stories of homeless, active substance users in an urban harm reduction based drop-in center, Addict Res Theory, 17, 622, 10.3109/16066350802168613 · DOI
  28. Elifson, 2007, Safe living: the impact of unstable housingconditions on HIV risk reduction among female drug users, AIDS Behav, 11, S45, 10.1007/s10461-007-9306-8 · DOI
  29. Fisher, 2002, Selection effect of needle exchange in Anchorage, Alaska., J Urban Health, 79, 128, 10.1093/jurban/79.1.128 · DOI
  30. Corneil, 2006, Unstable housing associated risk behavior, and increased risk for HIV infection among injection drug users, Health Place, 12, 79, 10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.10.004 · DOI
  31. DesJarlais, 2007, Unstable housing as a factor for increased injection risk behavior at US syringe exchange programs, AIDS Behav, 11, S78, 10.1007/s10461-007-9227-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 70

Metadata

Authors
MACNEIL, J., & PAULY, B.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
26-32
ISSN
0959-5236
Cited by
70
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review