The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modulation of leaf economic traits and trait relationships by climate
Abstract
Aim Our aim was to quantify climatic influences on key leaf traits and relationships at the global scale. This knowledge provides insight into how plants have adapted to different environmental pressures, and will lead to better calibration of future vegetation–climate models. Location The data set represents vegetation from 175 sites around the world. Methods For more than 2500 vascular plant species, we compiled data on leaf mass per area (LMA), leaf life span (LL), nitrogen concentration (N mass) and photosynthetic capacity (A mass). Site climate was described with several standard indices. Correlation and regression analyses were used for quantifying relationships between single leaf traits and climate. Standardized major axis (SMA) analyses were used for assessing the effect of climate on bivariate relationships between leaf traits. Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to summarize multidimensional trait variation. Results At hotter, drier and higher irradiance sites, (1) mean LMA and leaf N per area were higher; (2) average LL was shorter at a given LMA, or the increase in LL was less for a given increase in LMA (LL–LMA relationships became less positive); and (3) A mass was lower at a given N mass, or the increase in A mass was less for a given increase in N mass. Considering all traits simultaneously, 18% of variation along the principal multivariate trait axis was explained by climate. Main conclusions Trait‐shifts with climate were of sufficient magnitude to have major implications for plant dry mass and nutrient economics, and represent substantial selective pressures associated with adaptation to different climatic regimes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research
Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1969) · Cited by 20,963
(2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s303 · Cited by 17,923
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Self-citationDraper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1998) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118625590 · Cited by 5,024
Sitch, S., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Cramer, W., Kaplan, J. O., Levis, S., Lucht, W., Sykes, M. T., et al. (2003) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.x · Cited by 3,238
An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics
Campbell, G. S. (1977) · Heidelberg Science Library · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-9917-9 · Cited by 3,185
The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants Revisited: A Re-evaluation of Processes and Patterns
Aerts, R., & Chapin, F. S. (1999) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60016-1 · Cited by 2,885
An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics
Campbell, G. S., & Norman, J. M. (1998) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1626-1 · Cited by 2,723
Körner, C. (1999) · Cited by 2,682
Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Falster, D. S., Garnier, E., Hikosaka, K., Lamont, B. B., Lee, W., Oleksyn, J., Osada, N., et al. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01349.x · Cited by 2,598
Self-citation
Cited by
Cornwell, W. K., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Amatangelo, K., Dorrepaal, E., Eviner, V. T., Godoy, O., Hobbie, S. E., Hoorens, B., Kurokawa, H., Pérez‐Harguindeguy, N., et al. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x · Cited by 2,855
Self-citationBartlett, M. K., Scoffoni, C., & Sack, L. (2012) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01751.x · Cited by 1,076
A global study of relationships between leaf traits, climate and soil measures of nutrient fertility
Ordoñez, J. C., Van Bodegom, P. M., Witte, J. M., Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., & Aerts, R. (2009) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00441.x · Cited by 1,075
Self-citationLeaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China
Han, W., Fang, J., Guo, D., & Zhang, Y. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01530.x · Cited by 990
How do traits vary across ecological scales? A case for trait‐based ecology
Messier, J., McGill, B. J., & Lechowicz, M. J. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01476.x · Cited by 830
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Falster, D. S., Groom, P. K., Hikosaka, K., Lee, W., Lusk, C. H., Niinemets, Ü., Oleksyn, J., Osada, N., Poorter, H., Warton, D. I., & Westoby, M.
- Venue
- Global Ecology and Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-18
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 411-421
- ISSN
- 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-8238
- OpenAlex
- W2138240373
- Cited by
- 867
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 15.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modulation of leaf economic traits and trait relationships by climate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1466-822x.2005.00172.x
- The paper
- Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Falster, D. S., Groom, P. K., Hikosaka, K., Lee, W., Lusk, C. H., Niinemets, Ü., Oleksyn, J., Osada, N., Poorter, H., Warton, D. I., & Westoby, M. (2005). Modulation of leaf economic traits and trait relationships by climate. Global Ecology and Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822x.2005.00172.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.