The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant allometry, stoichiometry and the temperature‐dependence of primary productivity
Abstract
Aim While physical constraints influence terrestrial primary productivity, the extent to which geographical variation in productivity is influenced by physiological adaptations and changes in vegetation structure is unclear. Further, quantifying the effect of variability in species traits on ecosystems remains a critical research challenge. Here, we take a macroecological approach and ask if variation in the stoichiometric traits (C: N: P ratios) of plants and primary productivity across global‐scale temperature gradients is consistent with a scaling model that integrates recent insights from the theories of metabolic scaling and ecological stoichiometry. Location This study is global in scope, encompassing a wide variety of terrestrial plant communities. Methods We first develop a scaling model that incorporates potentially adaptive variation in leaf and whole‐plant nutrient content, kinetic aspects of photosynthesis and plant respiration, and the allometry of biomass partitioning and allocation. We then examine extensive data sets concerning the stoichiometry and productivity of diverse plant communities in light of the model. Results Across diverse ecosystems, both foliar stoichiometry (N : P) and ‘nitrogen productivity’ (which depends on both community size structure and plant nutrient content) vary systematically across global scale temperature gradients. Primary productivity shows no relationship to temperature. Main conclusions The model predicts that the observed patterns of variation in plant stoichiometry and nutrient productivity may offset the temperature dependence of primary production expected from the kinetics of photosynthesis alone. Our approach provides a quantitative framework for treating potentially adaptive functional variation across communities as a continuum and may thus inform studies of global change. More generally, our approach represents one of the first explicit combinations of ecological stoichiometry and metabolic scaling theories in the analysis of macroecological patterns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Effects of Size and Temperature on Metabolic Rate
Gillooly, J. F., Brown, J. H., West, G. B., Savage, V. M., & Charnov, E. L. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1061967 · Cited by 3,810
Lavorel, S., & Garnier, E. (2002) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x · Cited by 3,452
The Fourth Dimension of Life: Fractal Geometry and Allometric Scaling of Organisms
West, G. B., Brown, J. H., & Enquist, B. J. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5420.1677 · Cited by 1,718 · cited 1×
“…photosynthetic production, eqn 1 implies that both respiratory components must also scale as the 3/4 power of whole-plant mass, as predicted by allometric theory (Banavar et al ., 1999; West et al ., 1999) and observed across almost all organisms, i.e. (Ernest et al ., 2003b; Savage et al ., 2004).”
BackgroundThe McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later.
Amthor, J. (2000) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1006/anbo.2000.1175 · Cited by 822 · cited 9×
“However, this lack of consensus does demonstrate that, while generalized quantitative theory exists for many of the components of productivity (Thornley, 1970; Farquhar et al ., 1980; Amthor, 2000), these have not been integrated fully into a common modelling framework.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLinking the global carbon cycle to individual metabolism
ALLEN, A. P., GILLOOLY, J. F., & BROWN, J. H. (2005) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.00952.x · Cited by 579
Cited by
Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment
Sinsabaugh, R. L., Hill, B. H., & Follstad Shah, J. J. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08632 · Cited by 1,751
Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China
Han, W., Fang, J., Guo, D., & Zhang, Y. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01530.x · Cited by 990
A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere
Wang, Y. P., Law, R. M., & Pak, B. (2010) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-7-2261-2010 · Cited by 719
Potassium Control of Plant Functions: Ecological and Agricultural Implications
Sardans, J., & Peñuelas, J. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10020419 · Cited by 621
Phylogenetic and Growth Form Variation in the Scaling of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in the Seed Plants
Kerkhoff, A. J., Fagan, W. F., Elser, J. J., & Enquist, B. J. (2006) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/507879 · Cited by 503
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kerkhoff, A. J., Enquist, B. J., Elser, J. J., & Fagan, W. F.
- Venue
- Global Ecology and Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09-29
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 585-598
- ISSN
- 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-8238
- OpenAlex
- W2146475494
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 9.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant allometry, stoichiometry and the temperature‐dependence of primary productivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1466-822x.2005.00187.x
- The paper
- Kerkhoff, A. J., Enquist, B. J., Elser, J. J., & Fagan, W. F. (2005). Plant allometry, stoichiometry and the temperature‐dependence of primary productivity. Global Ecology and Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822x.2005.00187.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.