Cited by 120Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesBotany and Plant Ecology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Projecting trends in plant invasions in Europe under different scenarios of future land‐use change

Open access

Abstract

Aim Recent studies of plant invasions in habitat types across different climatic regions of Europe have made it possible to produce a European map of plant invasions. Parallel research led to the formulation of integrated scenarios of future socio‐economic development, which were used to create spatially explicit scenarios of European land‐use change for the 21st century. Here we integrate these two research lines and produce the first spatially explicit projections of plant invasions in Europe for the years 2020, 2050 and 2080. Location The European Union (except Bulgaria and Romania), Norway and Switzerland. Methods We used vegetation plots from southern, central and north‐western Europe to quantify mean levels of invasion by neophytes (post‐1500 alien plants) for forest, grassland, urban, arable and abandoned land. We projected these values on the land‐use scenarios for 2020, 2050 and 2080, and constructed maps of future plant invasions under three socio‐economic scenarios assuming: (1) deregulation and globalization, (2) continuation of current policies with standing regulations, and (3) a shift towards sustainable development. Results Under all scenarios an increase in the level of invasion was projected for north‐western and northern Europe, and under the first two scenarios a decrease for some agricultural areas of eastern Europe where abandonment of agricultural land is expected. A net increase in the level of invasion over Europe was projected under scenarios 2 and 3. Main conclusions The polarization between more and less invaded regions is likely to increase if future policies are oriented on economic deregulation, which may result in serious future problems in some areas of Europe. However, an implementation of sustainability policies would not automatically restrict the spread of alien plants. Therefore invasions require specific policy approaches beyond the more general ones, which are currently on the policy agenda and were tested in the scenarios.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00573.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Models of how levels of invasions and associated impacts will change in the next decades under different scenarios of socio-economic development and societal responses are still scarce or under development.

    “Models of how levels of invasions (and associated impacts) will change in the next decades under different scenarios of socio‐economic development and societal responses are still scarce (Chytrý et al., 2012) or are under development (Essl et al., 2019b ).”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Chytrý et al., 2012

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says the authors developed maps of future plant invasions across Europe under three socio-economic scenarios ‘for the first time,’ supporting the view that such models were scarce for Europe. It does not establish that models were scarce generally, and it considers associated impacts only indirectly rather than modelling them. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Alcamo J., 2001, Scenarios as tools for international environmental assessments
  2. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01305.x · DOI
  3. 10.1023/B:VEGE.0000049106.96330.9c · DOI
  4. Bossard M., 2000, CORINE land cover technical guide – addendum 2000
  5. Burnham K.P., 2002, Model selection and multi‐model inference: a practical information‐theoretic approach
  6. Chytrý M., 2005, Invasions by alien plants in the Czech Republic: a quantitative assessment across habitats, Preslia, 77, 339
  7. 10.1890/07-0682.1 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01398.x · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00515.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Chytrý M., 2009, Maps of the level of invasion of the Czech Republic by alien plants, Preslia, 81, 187
  11. Crawley M., 2002, Statistical computing. An introduction to data analysis using S‐Plus
  12. DAISIE, 2009, Handbook of alien species in Europe
  13. Davies C.E., 2004, EUNIS habitat classification revised 2004
  14. 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. Escarré J., 1983, Evolution de la végétation et du sol après abandon cultural en région méditerranéenne: étude de successions dans les Garrigues du Montpellierais (France), Acta Oecologica – Oecologia Plantarum, 4, 221
  16. European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity, 2006, The indicative map of European biogeographical regions: methodology and development
  17. Hobbs R.J., 2000, Invasive species in a changing world, 55
  18. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01227.x · DOI
  19. Hulme P.E., 2009, Common market, shared problems: time for a coordinated response to biological invasions in Europe?, Neobiota, 8, 3
  20. 10.1126/science.1171111 · DOI
  21. 10.1890/07-1594.1 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/fedr.200311015 · DOI
  23. Lambdon P.W., 2008, Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs, Preslia, 80, 101
  24. Legendre P., 1998, Numerical ecology
  25. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1522:GPOPIA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  27. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005, Ecosystems and human well‐being: synthesis
  28. 10.1016/0143-6228(94)90026-4 · DOI
  29. Perrings C., 2010, Bioinvasions and globalization. Ecology, economics, management, and policy
  30. 10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0025:EPSIHS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s10750-006-0189-x · DOI
  32. 10.2307/4135498 · DOI
  33. 10.1890/04-0012 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00237.x · DOI
  35. Reginster I., 2010, Atlas of biodiversity risk, 100
  36. Rejmánek M., 1989, Biological invasions: a global perspective, 369
  37. Rejmánek M., 2002, Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species, 249
  38. 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00107.x · DOI
  39. 10.1191/0309133306pp490pr · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.027 · DOI
  41. Schaminée J.H.J., 2009, Vegetation‐plot data and databases in Europe: an overview, Preslia, 81, 173
  42. 10.14512/gaia.14.1.20 · DOI
  43. van der Sluijs J., 2002, Management of uncertainty in science for sustainability
  44. Sokal R.R., 1995, Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research
  45. 10.1002/sd.320 · DOI
  46. Spangenberg J.H., 2009, Neither climate protection nor energy security: bio‐fuels for biofools?, Uluslararasi İlişkiler – International Relations, 20, 89
  47. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00620.x · DOI
  48. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00639.x · DOI
  49. 10.1890/04-1195 · DOI
  50. 10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00991.x · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.11.019 · DOI
  52. Vilà M., 2006, Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world, 93
  53. 10.1890/080083 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.2307/1941591 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.008 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1007/s101440050026 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chytrý, M., Wild, J., Pyšek, P., Jarošík, V., Dendoncker, N., Reginster, I., Pino, J., Maskell, L. C., Vilà, M., Pergl, J., Kühn, I., Spangenberg, J. H., & Settele, J.
Affiliations
  • Masaryk University (CZ)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
  • Estación Biológica de Doñana (ES)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Chytrý, Milan
Venue
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-12
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
75-87
ISSN
  • 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-8238
OpenAlex
W2141681007
Cited by
120
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Ecology and Biogeography (publishedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
  • ASEP (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository of the University of Namur (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Akademie Věd České Republiky ((AV0Z60050516))
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (CSD 2008-00040, CGL2009)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
Keywords
plant invasion, neophytes, non-native plants, land use change scenarios, socio-economic scenarios, sustainable development policy, economic deregulation, agricultural abandonment, Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review