The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
International Convergence of Accounting Practices: Choosing between IAS and US GAAP
Open accessAbstract
This study examines reporting practices of a sample of foreign listed and domestic‐only listed companies from the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Japan and Australia to determine the extent to which companies voluntarily use “international” standards. Two types of use of non‐national standards in the consolidated accounts presented to the public are considered: adoption of “international” standards instead of national standards, and supplementary use where “international” standards are used in conjunction with national standards. “International” standards are defined as US GAAP or IAS (now IFRS). The study tests for a preference for either set of standards and considers the relationship of choice of regime with firm attributes. The results show significant voluntary use of “international” standards in all five countries and among foreign listed and domestic‐only listed companies. Companies using “international” standards are likely to be larger, have more foreign revenue and to be listed on one or more foreign stock exchanges. US GAAP is the predominant choice, but IAS are used by many firms in Germany and some in Japan. Firms listed in the United States' regulated markets (NYSE and NASDAQ) are more likely to choose US GAAP, but companies traded in the OTC market often select IAS. The study demonstrates for managers and regulators that there is considerable support for “international” standards, and that choice of IAS or US GAAP relates to specific firm characteristics which differ according to a firm's country of origin. Most use of “international” standards reflects individual countries' institutional frameworks, confirming the key role of national regulators and standard setters in assisting companies to achieve more comparable international reporting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00018-0 · Cited by 8,097
The Economic Consequences of Increased Disclosure
Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.2307/2672910 · Cited by 2,370
Cited by
International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality
Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.688041 · Cited by 734
Lopes, P. T., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2007) · The International Journal of Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.intacc.2006.12.002 · Cited by 350
International Financial Reporting Standards and the quality of financial statement information
Iatridis, G. (2010) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2010.02.004 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Tarca, A.
- Venue
- Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 60-91
- ISSN
- 0954-1314 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-646X
- OpenAlex
- W3124375128
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 43.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Convergence of Accounting Practices: Choosing between IAS and US GAAP. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-646x.2004.00102.x
- The paper
- Tarca, A. (2004). International Convergence of Accounting Practices: Choosing between IAS and US GAAP. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-646x.2004.00102.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.