The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DISASTER CRISIS MANAGEMENT: A SUMMARY OF RESEARCH FINDINGS
Abstract
The crisis management of disasters does not follow automatically from disaster planning. Research has shown that successful disaster management results primarily from the activities of emergency organizations. In particular, there are management problems with respect to the communication process, the exercise of authority, and the development of co‐ordination. There are at least five different areas of difficulties in the communication process, namely, intra‐ and inter‐organizational behaviours between organizations, from organizations to the public, from the public to organizations, and within systems of organizations. Exercise of authority difficulties stem from losses of higher echelon personnel because of over‐work, conflict regarding authority over new disaster tasks, and clashes over organizational jurisdictional differences. Co‐ordination difficulties come from lack of consensus among organizations, working on common but new disaster‐related tasks, and difficulties in achieving overall co‐ordination in any community disaster that is of any magnitude. Prior planning can limit these management difficulties but cannot completely eliminate all of them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Organizational Response to Adversity: Fusing Crisis Management and Resilience Research Streams
Williams, T. A., Gruber, D. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Shepherd, D. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0134 · Cited by 1,945
The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards
Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x · Cited by 1,796
Pearson, C. M., & Clair, J. A. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.192960 · Cited by 1,534
Learning from the COVID-19 crisis: an initial analysis of national responses
Boin, A., Lodge, M., & Luesink, M. (2020) · Policy Design and Practice · doi:10.1080/25741292.2020.1823670 · Cited by 192
Understanding Business Failure: Learning and Un‐Learning From Industrial Crises
Stead, E., & Smallman, C. (1999) · Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management · doi:10.1111/1468-5973.00094 · Cited by 61
Bernacchio, C., & Foss, N. (2024) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4736313 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Quarantelli, E. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-07
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 373-385
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2090006146
- Cited by
- 764
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.