The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE CULT[URE] OF THE CUSTOMER
Abstract
Much organizational restructuring, at least in the UK and USA, seeks to replace organizational regulation by that of the market. These developments centre around an emphasis on relations with customers ‐ the ‘sovereign consumer’‐ as a paradigm for effective forms of organizational relations; they are apparent in, and underpin, a wide variety of organizational developments: just‐in‐time, total quality management, culture change programmes. Understanding these developments requires consideration of the discourse of enterprise of which the culture of the (internal) customer constitutes a key element. Defining internal organizational relations ‘as if’they were customer/supplier relations means replacing bureaucratic regulation and stability with the constant uncertainties of the market, and thus requiring enterprise from employees. This discourse has fundamental implications for management attempts to define working practices and relations and, ultimately, has impact on the conduct and identities of employees. Understanding these developments is not possible if analysis remains at the level of the organization. It requires that organizational restructurings, and the discourse which supports them, be located within the social and political rationality of enterprise. The certainties of management, the conviction that environmental challenge and competitive threat must be met by the cult[ure] of the customer, are due to managements’largely unquestioned acceptance of the normality and perceived good sense of the discourse of enterprise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085149000000001 · Cited by 2,877 · cited 3×
“…for making the world 'work better', but, in addition, it also enables these programmes 'to be translated into a range of technologies to administer individuals and groups in a way . . . consonant with prevailing ethical systems and political mentalities' (Miller and Rose, 1990, p. 24; Rose, 1990).”
Background
Cited by
Working at a Cynical Distance: Implications for Power, Subjectivity and Resistance
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508403010001376 · Cited by 835
The Appeal to ‘Professionalism’ as a Disciplinary Mechanism
Fournier, V. (1999) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/1467-954x.00173 · Cited by 779
Bookkeeping, accounting, calculative practice: the sociological suspense of calculation
Vollmer, H. (2003) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1006/cpac.2002.0528 · Cited by 125
Conceptualizing Power in Organizations
Vallas, S. P., & Hill, A. (2012) · Research in the Sociology of Organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x(2012)0000034009 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Gay, P. D., & Salaman, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 615-633
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2001044202
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.