The DOI matches its Crossref record.
LEARNING BY KNOWLEDGE‐INTENSIVE FIRMS*
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893 · Cited by 4,164
Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776 · Cited by 3,021
Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation
Blackler, F. (1995) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069501600605 · Cited by 2,498
Anand, N., Gardner, H. K., & Morris, T. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24634457 · Cited by 509
Anderson, S., Leithwood, K., & Strauss, T. (2010) · Leadership and Policy in Schools · doi:10.1080/15700761003731492 · Cited by 210
Customer knowledge transfer and key account management in professional service organizations
Nätti, S., Halinen, A., & Hanttu, N. (2006) · International Journal of Service Industry Management · doi:10.1108/09564230610680631 · Cited by 65
Islands of Practice: Conflict and a Lack of ‘Community’ in Situated Learning
Macpherson, A., & Clark, B. (2009) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507609340810 · Cited by 49
Embeddedness of individual expertise in professional business service relationships
Nätti, S., & Ulkuniemi, P. (2022) · Knowledge and Process Management · doi:10.1002/kpm.1702 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Starbuck, W. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 713-740
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W3122322539
- Cited by
- 1,430
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.