Cited by 46Innovative Education and Learning PracticesOrganizational Learning and LeadershipManagement and Organizational Studies

Islands of Practice: Conflict and a Lack of ‘Community’ in Situated Learning

Macpherson, Allan, Clark, Brenton·2009·Management Learning

Abstract

We examine how, in a utility company, existing practices and performance systems limited the scope of situated learning. We contribute to the understanding of situated learning by exploring how conflict, systems and artefacts also shape the trajectory of situated learning rather than just a sense of identity or meaningful participation. Systems and artefacts mediate interactions in organizations and potentially contribute to boundaries between teams, resulting in ‘islands of practice’ and stark variations in performance. This case study broadens our understanding of situated learning in organizations by challenging the relevance of ‘community’ in contemporary organizations where conflict and transience may be prevalent. We argue that practices and objects/artefacts are a fruitful way of researching organizational learning; situated learning in organizations is likely to be continually emerging against a constant battle to stabilize an appropriate set of practices that support the aims of management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1350507609340810

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Engeström, Y., paper presented at conference on ‘Collective Cognition and Memory Practices: Building the Infrastructures of Distributed Collective Activity’
  2. Hatch, M.J., 1997, Organization Theory
  3. Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. and Yanow, D. ( 2003) ‘Introduction: Towards a Practice-Based View of Knowing and Learning in Organization’, in D. Nicolini et al. (eds) Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based View, pp. 3-29. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
  4. Schatzki, T. ( 2001) ‘Introduction: Practice Theory’, in T. Schatzki et al. (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, pp. 1-14. London: Routledge.
  5. Stake, R. ( 2000) ‘Case Studies’, in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 435-54. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macpherson, A., & Clark, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Fujitsu (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
Management Learning
Published
2009-10-21
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
551-568
ISSN
  • 1350-5076 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7307
OpenAlex
W2043664783
Cited by
46
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Management Learning (publishedVersion)
  • DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
situated learning, organizational learning, organizational conflict, community, artifacts, organizational practices, performance systems, public utilities, team boundaries, transience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review