Cited by 77Outsourcing and Supply Chain ManagementEconomic Theory and InstitutionsManagement and Organizational Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE ‘COMPARATIVE INSTITUTIONAL’ THEORY OF THE FIRM: SOME IMPLICATIONS FOR CORPORATE STRATEGY*

Hennart, Jean‐Franois·1994·Journal of Management Studies

Abstract

This article outlines a rationale for the existence of firms and derives its implications for corporate strategy. It argues that one important source of sustainable rents is the ability of firms to reduce the costs they experience in organizing both internal and external transaction below those of their rivals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00771.x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Abegglen J., 1958, The Japanese Factory: Aspects of its Social Organization
  2. Barney J.(1990). ‘Individual differences and the choice of governance mechanisms: transaction costs organizational resources and competitive advantage.Paper presented at the Conference on Corporate Governance and Competitive Strategy University of Minnesota October.
  3. Chandler A., 1977, The Visible Hand
  4. 10.1002/smj.4250120802 · DOI
  5. Hill C.(1990). ‘The emergence of cooperation without hierarchical governance: implications for transaction cost theory and the theory of the firm.Paper presented at the Conference on Corporate Governance and Competitive Strategy University of Minnesota October.
  6. Jack A., 1957, The channels of distribution of an innovation: the sewing machine industry in America, Explorations in Entrepreneurial History, 9, 113
  7. Keller M., 1989, Rude Awakening
  8. Porter M., 1980, Competitive Strategy
  9. Schonberger R., 1982, Japanese Manufacturing Techniques: Nine Lessons in Simplicity
  10. Shelton J., 1967, Allocative efficiency vs. X‐efficiency: comment, American Economic Review, 57, 1252
  11. Stertz B.(1990). ‘Big three boost quality but still lag.Wall Street Journal September B1.
  12. Stertz B.(1992). ‘Detroit's new strategy to beat back Japanese is to copy their ideas.Wall Street Journal 1 October A1 A10.
  13. Tannenbaum J.andMarsh B.(1990). ‘Firms try to tighten grip on franchisees.Wall Street Journal 15 January.
  14. White J.(1992). ‘For Saturn copying Japan yields hot sales but no profits.Wall Street Journal 1 October A10.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 77

Metadata

Authors
Hennart, J.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Hennart, Jean‐Franois
Venue
Journal of Management Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-03
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
193-208
ISSN
  • 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6486
OpenAlex
W2132781290
Cited by
77
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
theory of the firm, business strategy, transaction costs, business organization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review