The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crossing the Threshold from Founder Management to Professional Management: A Governance Perspective
Abstract
ABSTRACT We argue that the challenges faced by threshold firms are deeply rooted in governance characteristics (i.e. the incentives, authority and legitimacy) which imbue them with characteristic capabilities, disabilities and path dependencies. Whereas Zahra and Filatotchev (2004) reason the principal problem facing threshold firms relates to organizational learning and knowledge management, we posit resource acquisition and utilization to be equally important. Moreover, we argue governance theory is more able than a knowledge‐based perspective to explain the root causes of the learning and resource issues faced by threshold firms as well as the complex set of processes involved in their effective management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
Towards an understanding of inequity
Adams, J. S. (1963) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040968 · Cited by 5,146
Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements
Rousseau, D. (1995) · doi:10.4135/9781452231594 · Cited by 3,453
An economic theory of self-control.
Thaler, R. H., & Shefrin, H. M. (1981) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260971 · Cited by 2,203 · cited 1×
“These problems, which Thaler and Shefrin (1981) call ‘agency problems with oneself,’ are especially potent in FMFs because founders have the authority and legitimacy to pursue options they perceive to be ‘first best’ in terms of their subjective utility.”
Background
Cited by
Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Achievements and Future Promises
Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318793196 · Cited by 1,001
Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0665 · Cited by 832
Stewart, A., & Hitt, M. A. (2012) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/0894486511421665 · Cited by 593
The Ability and Willingness Paradox in Family Firm Innovation
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., & Wright, M. (2015) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12207 · Cited by 566
The Adolescence of Family Firm Research: Taking Stock and Planning for the Future
Gedajlovic, E., Carney, M., Chrisman, J. J., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311429990 · Cited by 437
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gedajlovic, E., Lubatkin, M. H., & Schulze, W. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06-24
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 899-912
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2102454794
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 18.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crossing the Threshold from Founder Management to Professional Management: A Governance Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00459.x
- The paper
- Gedajlovic, E., Lubatkin, M. H., & Schulze, W. S. (2004). Crossing the Threshold from Founder Management to Professional Management: A Governance Perspective. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00459.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
