The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Family Control and Family Firm Valuation by Family CEOs: The Importance of Intentions for Transgenerational Control
Open accessAbstract
Family firms are thought to pursue nonfinancial goals that provide socioemotional wealth, but socioemotional wealth is feasible only with family control of the firm. Using prospect theory, we hypothesize that socioemotional wealth increases with the extent of current control, duration of control, and intentions for transgenerational control, thus adding to the price at which owners would be willing to sell their firms to nonfamily buyers. Findings from two countries show that current control has no impact, and duration of control has a mixed impact. However, intention for transgenerational control has a consistently positive impact on the perceived acceptable selling price.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,867
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x · Cited by 71,491
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Decision, Probability and Utility · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,474
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations
Bhagat, R. S., & Hofstede, G. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134391 · Cited by 21,664
Cited by
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/0894486511435355 · Cited by 2,724
Zellweger, T. M., Nason, R. S., & Nordqvist, M. (2012) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/0894486511423531 · Cited by 561
Self-citationCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting: A Content Analysis in Family and Non-family Firms
Campopiano, G., & De Massis, A. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2174-z · Cited by 473
Managerial Risk Taking: A Multitheoretical Review and Future Research Agenda
Hoskisson, R. E., Chirico, F., Zyung, J. (., & Gambeta, E. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316671583 · Cited by 441
Building a family firm image: How family firms capitalize on their family ties
Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., & Memili, E. (2012) · Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.10.001 · Cited by 288
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 851-868
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2115973166
- Cited by
- 832
- References
- 99
- FWCI
- 55.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Family Control and Family Firm Valuation by Family CEOs: The Importance of Intentions for Transgenerational Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.1110.0665
- The paper
- Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2012). Family Control and Family Firm Valuation by Family CEOs: The Importance of Intentions for Transgenerational Control. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0665
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
