The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Search of Authenticity*
Open accessAbstract
abstractAfter showing that authenticity is socially constructed rather than an attribute of that which is called authentic, we examine the authenticity work involved in claiming authenticity and discuss the processes of authentication. We then explore the situations in which the quest for authenticity makes for change and conclude by showing that the salience of authenticity can change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Halbwachs, M., & Coser, L. A. (1992) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226774497.001.0001 · Cited by 4,939
Society, Culture, and Person: A Systems View of Creativity
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014) · The Systems Model of Creativity · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_4 · Cited by 1,289
Performing Rites: Evaluating Popular Music
Frith, S. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198163329.001.0001 · Cited by 1,122
Cited by
Lehman, D. W., O’Connor, K., Kovács, B., & Newman, G. E. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0047 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Peterson, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1083-1098
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2029979818
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Search of Authenticity*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00533.x
- The paper
- Peterson, R. A. (2005). In Search of Authenticity*. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00533.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
