The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Finding Form: Looking at the Field of Organizational Aesthetics
Abstract
abstract Organizational research has long focused on the instrumental sphere with its questions of efficiency and effectiveness and in recent decades there has been interest in the moral sphere with its questions of ethics. Within the last decade there has also emerged a field that draws on the aesthetic sphere of our existence in organizations. In this review we look at the field of organizational aesthetics in terms of content and method, suggesting four broad categories of organizational aesthetics research: intellectual analysis of instrumental issues, artistic form used to look at instrumental issues, intellectual analysis of aesthetic issues, and artistic form used to look at aesthetic issues. We then suggest how organizational scholars might pursue artistic aesthetic organizational research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing
Uhl-Bien, M. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007 · Cited by 1,973
Understanding Arts-Based Methods in Managerial Development
Taylor, S. S., & Ladkin, D. (2009) · Academy of Management Learning & Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2009.37012179 · Cited by 408
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, S. S., & Hansen, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-12
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1211-1231
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W3124765541
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Finding Form: Looking at the Field of Organizational Aesthetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00539.x
- The paper
- Taylor, S. S., & Hansen, H. (2005). Finding Form: Looking at the Field of Organizational Aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00539.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
