The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adopting Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Influence of Stakeholders and Firm Size
Abstract
abstract While smaller firms are less likely to undertake as many environmental practices as larger firms, extant literature suggests that smaller firms may be more responsive to stakeholder pressures. This paper contributes to the development of stakeholder theory by deriving a size moderated stakeholder model and applying it to a firm's adoption of proactive environmental practices. The empirical results show that smaller firms are more responsive to value‐chain, internal, and regulatory stakeholder pressures. These findings suggest that researchers evaluating organizations and the natural environment should be cautious about associating stakeholder pressures directly with firms' environmental strategies. Rather, the relationship between stakeholder pressures and environmental strategy tends to vary with size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Banerjee, S. B. (2001) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00246 · Cited by 538 · cited 1×
“Managers think about stakeholders based on their perceptions (Donaldson and Preston, 1995) and therefore serve as a critical interpreter of stakeholder influence (Banerjee, 2001; Fineman and Clarke, 1996).”
Cited by
A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models: Value Creation for Sustainability
Freudenreich, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Schaltegger, S. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z · Cited by 995
Post, C., Rahman, N., & McQuillen, C. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2231-7 · Cited by 381
Delmas, M. A., & Pekovic, S. (2013) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1827 · Cited by 341
Wang, K., & Jiang, W. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128029 · Cited by 166
Improving the Sustainable Development of Firms: The Role of Employees
Wolf, J. (2013) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1731 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-20
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1072-1094
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2122491621
- Cited by
- 988
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 43.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adopting Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Influence of Stakeholders and Firm Size. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00873.x
- The paper
- Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Influence of Stakeholders and Firm Size. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00873.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
