CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 166Environmental Sustainability in BusinessSustainability and Innovation in BusinessInternational Business and FDI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

State ownership and green innovation in China: The contingent roles of environmental and organizational factors

Wang, Kui, Jiang, Wei·2021·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128029
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128029

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. Albort-Morant, 2016, The antecedents of green innovation performance: a model of learning and capabilities, J. Bus. Res., 69, 4912, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.052 · DOI
  2. Albort-Morant, 2018, Absorptive capacity and relationship learning mechanisms as complementary drivers of green innovation performance, J. Knowl. Manag., 22, 432, 10.1108/JKM-07-2017-0310 · DOI
  3. Ambec, 2008, Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview, Acad. Manag. Perspect., 22, 45, 10.5465/amp.2008.35590353 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ang, 2016, Good apples, bad apples: sorting among Chinese companies traded in the U.S, J. Bus. Ethics, 134, 611, 10.1007/s10551-014-2387-1 · DOI
  5. Audia, 2006, Less likely to fail: low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the Shipbuilding industry, Manag. Sci., 52, 83, 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0446 · DOI
  6. Bai, 2019, The impacts of government R&D subsidies on green innovation: evidence from Chinese energy-intensive firms, J. Clean. Prod., 233, 819, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.107 · DOI
  7. Bansal, 2005, Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development, Strat. Manag. J., 26, 197, 10.1002/smj.441 · DOI
  8. Barney, 2018, Why resource-based theory's model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective, Strat. Manag. J., 39, 3305, 10.1002/smj.2949 · DOI
  9. Berrone, 2017, Does greenwashing pay off? Understanding the relationship between environmental actions and environmental legitimacy, J. Bus. Ethics, 144, 363, 10.1007/s10551-015-2816-9 · DOI
  10. Berrone, 2013, Necessity as the mother of 'green' inventions: institutional pressures and environmental innovations, Strat. Manag. J., 34, 891, 10.1002/smj.2041 · DOI
  11. Blevins, 2018, An examination of the effects of venture capitalists on the alliance formation activity of entrepreneurial firms, Strat. Manag. J., 39, 2075, 10.1002/smj.2912 · DOI
  12. Boivie, 2016, Come aboard! Exploring the effects of directorships in the executive labor market, Acad. Manag. J., 59, 1681, 10.5465/amj.2014.0840 · DOI
  13. Bourgeois, 1981, On the measurement of organizational slack, Acad. Manag. Rev., 6, 29, 10.2307/257138 · DOI
  14. Boyd, 2018, When) does third-party recognition for design excellence affect financial performance in business-to-business markets?, J. Market., 82, 108, 10.1509/jm.15.0150 · DOI
  15. Buyl, 2011, Top management team functional diversity and firm performance: the moderating role of CEO characteristics, J. Manag. Stud., 48, 151, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00932.x · DOI
  16. Chang, 2011, The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: the mediation role of green innovation, J. Bus. Ethics, 104, 361, 10.1007/s10551-011-0914-x · DOI
  17. Chang, 2016, The determinants of green product innovation performance, Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., 23, 65, 10.1002/csr.1361 · DOI
  18. Chen, 2006, Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: evidence from China, J. Corp. Finance, 12, 424, 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.09.002 · DOI
  19. Chen, 2013, The determinants of green product development performance: green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity, J. Bus. Ethics, 116, 107, 10.1007/s10551-012-1452-x · DOI
  20. Cheng, 2020, Sustainability orientation, green supplier involvement, and green innovation performance: evidence from diversifying green entrants, J. Bus. Ethics, 161, 393, 10.1007/s10551-018-3946-7 · DOI
  21. Cheng, 2017, Will corporate political connection influence the environmental information disclosure level? Based on the panel data of A-shares from listed companies in Shanghai stock market, J. Bus. Ethics, 143, 209, 10.1007/s10551-015-2776-0 · DOI
  22. Chu, 2018, Institutional theory and environmental pressures:The moderating effect of market uncertainty on innovation and firm performance, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 65, 392, 10.1109/TEM.2018.2794453 · DOI
  23. Cohen, 1990, Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Adm. Sci. Q., 35, 128, 10.2307/2393553 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Dacin, 2007, The legitimacy of strategic alliances: an institutional perspective, Strat. Manag. J., 28, 169, 10.1002/smj.577 · DOI
  25. Darnall, 2010, Adopting proactive environmental strategy: the influence of stakeholders and firm size, J. Manag. Stud., 47, 1072, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00873.x · DOI
  26. Desender, 2016, A clash of governance logics: foreign ownership and board monitoring, Strat. Manag. J., 37, 349, 10.1002/smj.2344 · DOI
  27. Dess, 1984, Dimensions of organizational task environments, Adm. Sci. Q., 29, 52, 10.2307/2393080 · DOI
  28. DiMaggio, 1983, The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, Am. Socio. Rev., 48, 147, 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Dutta, 1999, Success in high-technology markets: is marketing capability critical?, Market. Sci., 18, 547, 10.1287/mksc.18.4.547 · DOI
  30. Etzion, 2007, Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: a review, J. Manag., 33, 637
  31. Fang, 2017, Intellectual property rights protection, ownership, and innovation: evidence from China, Rev. Financ. Stud., 30, 2446, 10.1093/rfs/hhx023 · DOI
  32. Hao, 2019, The role of returnee executives in improving green innovation performance of Chinese manufacturing enterprises: implications for sustainable development strategy, Bus. Strat. Environ., 28, 804, 10.1002/bse.2282 · DOI
  33. Haveman, 2017, The dynamics of political embeddedness in China, Adm. Sci. Q., 62, 67, 10.1177/0001839216657311 · DOI
  34. Horbach, 2008, Determinants of environmental innovation—new evidence from German panel data sources, Res. Pol., 37, 163, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006 · DOI
  35. Hsu, 2013, Banking systems, innovations, intellectual property protections, and financial markets: evidence from China, J. Bus. Res., 66, 2390, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.025 · DOI
  36. Huang, 2017, Green innovation and performance: the view of organizational capability and social reciprocity, J. Bus. Ethics, 145, 309, 10.1007/s10551-015-2903-y · DOI
  37. Huang, 2017, Institutional regime shift in intellectual property rights and innovation strategies of firms in China, Organ. Sci., 28, 355, 10.1287/orsc.2017.1117 · DOI
  38. Huang, 2021, Do politically connected CEOs promote Chinese listed industrial firms' green innovation? The mediating role of external governance environments, J. Clean. Prod., 278, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123634 · DOI
  39. Jia, 2019, Public governance, corporate governance, and firm innovation: an examination of state-owned enterprises, Acad. Manag. J., 62, 220, 10.5465/amj.2016.0543 · DOI
  40. Jiang, 2003, Seeing the need for ISO 14001, J. Manag. Stud., 40, 1047, 10.1111/1467-6486.00370 · DOI
  41. Jiang, 2020, Stakeholder relationship capability and firm innovation: a contingent analysis, J. Bus. Ethics, 167, 111, 10.1007/s10551-019-04161-4 · DOI
  42. Jones, 2018, How applying instrumental stakeholder theory can provide sustainable competitive advantage, Acad. Manag. Rev., 43, 371, 10.5465/amr.2016.0111 · DOI
  43. Ju, 2013, Technological capability growth and performance outcome: foreign versus local firms in China, J. Int. Market., 21, 1, 10.1509/jim.12.0171 · DOI
  44. Kanashiro, 2019, Do chief sustainability officers make companies greener? The moderating role of regulatory pressures, J. Bus. Ethics, 155, 687, 10.1007/s10551-017-3461-2 · DOI
  45. Kogut, 1992, Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology, Organ. Sci., 3, 383, 10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Lane, 2006, The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct, Acad. Manag. Rev., 31, 833, 10.5465/amr.2006.22527456 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Leenders, 2013, Antecedents and consequences of green innovation in the wine industry: the role of channel structure, Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag., 25, 203, 10.1080/09537325.2012.759203 · DOI
  48. Li, 2018, Environmental legitimacy, green innovation, and corporate carbon disclosure: evidence from CDP China 100, J. Bus. Ethics, 150, 1089, 10.1007/s10551-016-3187-6 · DOI
  49. Li, 2008, Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms, Strat. Manag. J., 29, 383, 10.1002/smj.665 · DOI
  50. Li, 2015, Political connection, ownership structure, and corporate philanthropy in China: a strategic-political perspective, J. Bus. Ethics, 129, 399, 10.1007/s10551-014-2167-y · DOI
  51. Li, 2016, Institutional interest, ownership type, and environmental capital expenditures: evidence from the most polluting Chinese listed firms, J. Bus. Ethics, 138, 459, 10.1007/s10551-015-2616-2 · DOI
  52. Lin, 2015, How political connections affect corporate environmental performance: the mediating role of green subsidies, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess., 21, 2192, 10.1080/10807039.2015.1044937 · DOI
  53. Liu, 2017, Linking capabilities to green operations strategies: the moderating role of corporate environmental proactivity, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 187, 182, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.007 · DOI
  54. Liu, 2020, Green or nongreen innovation? Different strategic preferences among subsidized enterprises with different ownership types, J. Clean. Prod., 245, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118786 · DOI
  55. Luo, 2014, How does CEO tenure matter? The mediating role of firm-employee and firm-customer relationships, Strat. Manag. J., 35, 492, 10.1002/smj.2112 · DOI
  56. Melander, 2018, Customer and supplier collaboration in green product innovation: external and internal capabilities, Bus. Strat. Environ., 27, 677, 10.1002/bse.2024 · DOI
  57. Olsen, 2014, Green claims and message frames: how green new products change brand attitude, J. Market., 78, 119, 10.1509/jm.13.0387 · DOI
  58. Peng, 2003, Institutional transitions and strategic choices, Acad. Manag. Rev., 28, 275, 10.2307/30040713 · DOI
  59. Piperopoulos, 2018, Outward FDI, location choices and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises, Res. Pol., 47, 232, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.001 · DOI
  60. Porter, 1995, Green and competitive: ending the stalemate, Harv. Bus. Rev., 73, 120
  61. Rosenbaum, 1983, The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, Biometrika, 70, 41, 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Schmitz, 2019, The contextual role of regulatory stakeholder pressure in proactive environmental strategies: an empirical test of competing theoretical perspectives, Organ. Environ., 32, 281, 10.1177/1086026617745992 · DOI
  63. Shi, 2017, Institutional fragility and outward foreign direct investment from China, J. Int. Bus. Stud., 48, 452, 10.1057/s41267-016-0050-z · DOI
  64. Staw, 1981, Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: a multilevel analysis, Adm. Sci. Q., 26, 501, 10.2307/2392337 · DOI
  65. Sun, 2016, The dark side of board political capital: enabling blockholder rent appropriation, Acad. Manag. J., 59, 1801, 10.5465/amj.2014.0425 · DOI
  66. Tan, 2002, Impact of ownership type on environment–strategy linkage and performance: evidence from a transitional economy, J. Manag. Stud., 39, 333, 10.1111/1467-6486.00295 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Tan, 2005, Environment-strategy co-evolution and co-alignment: a staged model of Chinese SOEs under transition, Strat. Manag. J., 26, 141, 10.1002/smj.437 · DOI
  68. Tang, 2018, Green innovation, managerial concern and firm performance: an empirical study, Bus. Strat. Environ., 27, 39, 10.1002/bse.1981 · DOI
  69. Tang, 2015, How CEO hubris affects corporate social (ir)responsibility, Strat. Manag. J., 36, 1338, 10.1002/smj.2286 · DOI
  70. Tsai, 2017, Innovation capacity and the implementation of eco-innovation: toward a contingency perspective, Bus. Strat. Environ., 26, 1000, 10.1002/bse.1963 · DOI
  71. Vidal-Salazar, 2012, Human resource management and developing proactive environmental strategies: the influence of environmental training and organizational learning, Hum. Resour. Manag., 51, 905, 10.1002/hrm.21507 · DOI
  72. Wang, 2018, Government's green grip: multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China, Strat. Manag. J., 39, 403, 10.1002/smj.2714 · DOI
  73. Woo, 2014, Impact of green innovation on labor productivity and its determinants: an analysis of the Korean manufacturing industry, Bus. Strat. Environ., 23, 567, 10.1002/bse.1807 · DOI
  74. Xie, 2019, Turning green subsidies into sustainability: how green process innovation improves firms' green image, Bus. Strat. Environ., 28, 1416, 10.1002/bse.2323 · DOI
  75. Xie, 2018, Exporting and innovating among emerging market firms: the moderating role of institutional development, J. Int. Bus. Stud., 49, 222, 10.1057/s41267-017-0118-4 · DOI
  76. Xu, 2019, Deviant versus aspirational risk taking: the effects of performance feedback on bribery expenditure and R&D intensity, Acad. Manag. J., 62, 1226, 10.5465/amj.2016.0749 · DOI
  77. Yan, 2018, The contingent effects of political strategies on firm performance: a political network perspective, Strat. Manag. J., 39, 2152, 10.1002/smj.2908 · DOI
  78. Yang, 2019, Environmental strategy, institutional force, and innovation capability: a managerial cognition perspective, J. Bus. Ethics, 159, 1147, 10.1007/s10551-018-3830-5 · DOI
  79. Yang, 2012, Dealing with institutional distances in international marketing channels: governance strategies that engender legitimacy and efficiency, J. Market., 76, 41, 10.1509/jm.10.0033 · DOI
  80. Yao, 2019, Green innovation and brand equity: moderating effects of industrial institutions, Asia Pac. J. Manag.
  81. Yen, 2018, Buyer-supplier collaboration in green practices: the driving effects from stakeholders, Bus. Strat. Environ., 27, 1666, 10.1002/bse.2231 · DOI
  82. Zhang, 2019, Enhancing corporate sustainable development: stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation, Bus. Strat. Environ., 28, 1012, 10.1002/bse.2298 · DOI
  83. Zhang, 2016, Do political connections buffer firms from or bind firms to the government? A study of corporate charitable donations of Chinese firms, Organ. Sci., 27, 1307, 10.1287/orsc.2016.1084 · DOI
  84. Zhang, 2019, Does China's emissions trading system foster corporate green innovation? Evidence from regulating listed companies, Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag., 31, 199, 10.1080/09537325.2018.1493189 · DOI
  85. Zhao, 2018, External involvement and green product innovation: the moderating role of environmental uncertainty, Bus. Strat. Environ., 27, 1167, 10.1002/bse.2060 · DOI
  86. Zhou, 2017, State ownership and firm innovation in China: an integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics, Adm. Sci. Q., 62, 375, 10.1177/0001839216674457 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Wang, K., & Jiang, W.
Affiliations
  • Shenzhen Audencia Financial Technology Institute (CN)
  • Xiamen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Jiang, Wei
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
314
Pages
128029
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128029
OpenAlex
W3173626744
Cited by
166
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 4
FWCI
25.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (72072149)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Sustainability and Innovation in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
Keywords
state ownership, green innovation, institutional environment, legal developments, firm resources, emerging markets, Chinese listed companies, institutional theory, resource-based view

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: State ownership and green innovation in China: The contingent roles of environmental and organizational factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128029
The paper
Wang, K., & Jiang, W. (2021). State ownership and green innovation in China: The contingent roles of environmental and organizational factors. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128029