The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reflections on Enacted Sensemaking in the Bhopal Disaster
Open accessAbstract
An updated analysis of the Bhopal disaster suggests that problems of abduction, awareness, reliability, and certainty were more serious than was first thought. Expanded analysis shows that the tight coupling between cognition and action, normally associated with enacted sensemaking, broke down at Bhopal. The breakdowns included a low standard of plausibility, minimal doubt, infrequent updating of both mental models and current hunches, and mindless action. The modest enactment that did occur prolonged rather than shortened the crisis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The dark side of organizations: mistake, misconduct, and disaster.
Vaughan, D. (1999) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.271 · Cited by 1,072
Cited by
Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.873177 · Cited by 1,764
Huber, S. G., & Helm, C. (2020) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-020-09322-y · Cited by 507
Kjaergaard, A., Morsing, M., & Ravasi, D. (2011) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00954.x · Cited by 149
Speaking up to prevent harm: A systematic review of the safety voice literature
Noort, M. C., Reader, T. W., & Gillespie, A. (2019) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.039 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Weick, K. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-03-08
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 537-550
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2013073156
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
