The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Five‐Factor Model In Personality: A Critical Appraisal
Abstract
ABSTRACT This critical appraisal aims to position the five‐factor model within the multifaceted field of personality psychology by highlighting six important limitations of the model. These are the model's (a) inability to address core constructs of personality functioning beyond the level of traits; (b) limitations with respect to the prediction of specific behavior and the adequate description of personsl' lives; (c) failure to provide compelling causal explanations for human behavior and experience; (d) disregard of the contextual and conditional nature of human experience; (e) failure to offer an attractive program for studying personality organization and integration; and (f) reliance on simple, noncontingent, and implicitly comparative statements about persons. The five‐factor model is essentially a “psychology of the stranger,” providing information about persons that one would need to know when one knows nothing else about them. It is argued that because of inherent limitations, the Big Five may be viewed as one important model in personality studies but not the integrative model of personality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · Cited by 6,404
Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study.
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936) · Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093360 · Cited by 2,018
The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters.
Cattell, R. B. (1943) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054116 · Cited by 987
Was Gordon Allport a trait theorist?
Zuroff, D. C. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.993 · Cited by 86
Cited by
(1999) · Cited by 7,995
A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity
Feist, G. J. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5 · Cited by 2,180
A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.
Block, J. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187 · Cited by 1,682
Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.729 · Cited by 1,996
RECONCILING PROCESSING DYNAMICS AND PERSONALITY DISPOSITIONS
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.229 · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Authors
- McAdams, D. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 329-361
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W2102473250
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Five‐Factor Model In Personality: A Critical Appraisal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00976.x
- The paper
- McAdams, D. P. (1992). The Five‐Factor Model In Personality: A Critical Appraisal. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00976.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.