The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Socioemotional Selectivity Theory, Aging, and Health: The Increasingly Delicate Balance Between Regulating Emotions and Making Tough Choices
Abstract
Abstract After providing an introductory overview of socioemotional selectivity theory, we review empirical evidence for its basic postulates and consider the implications of the predicted cognitive and behavioral changes for physical health. The main assertion of socioemotional selectivity theory is that when boundaries on time are perceived, present‐oriented goals related to emotional meaning are prioritized over future‐oriented goals aimed at acquiring information and expanding horizons. Such motivational changes, which are strongly correlated with chronological age, systematically influence social preferences, social network composition, emotion regulation, and cognitive processing. On the one hand, there is considerable reason to believe that such changes are good for well‐being and social adjustment. On the other hand, the very same motivational changes may limit health‐related information‐seeking and influence attention, memory, and decision‐making such that positive material is favored over negative information. Grounding our arguments in socioemotional selectivity theory, we consider possible ways to tailor contexts such that disadvantages are avoided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.54.3.165 · Cited by 5,377 · cited 1×
“Our research team has demonstrated that time perspective drives age differences in social preferences (Fredrickson & Carstensen, 1990; Fung 1999; Fung & Carstensen, in press; Fung, Lai, & Ng, 2001).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBERKMAN, L. F., & SYME, S. L. (1979) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112674 · Cited by 5,341
Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory
Carstensen, L. L. (1992) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.7.3.331 · Cited by 2,174
Self-citationTHE CONTRIBUTION OF THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT TO HOST RESISTANCE1
CASSEL, J. (1976) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112281 · Cited by 1,816
Cortisol levels during human aging predict hippocampal atrophy and memory deficits
Lupien, S. J., de Leon, M., de Santi, S., Convit, A., Tarshish, C., Nair, N. P. V., Thakur, M., McEwen, B. S., Hauger, R. L., & Meaney, M. J. (1998) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/271 · Cited by 1,653
Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity
Carstensen, L. L. (1995) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512261 · Cited by 1,458
Self-citationAssessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment
Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198812223192504 · Cited by 1,399 · cited 1×
“Once a set of possible options is established, decision makers need to employ sound strategies to discern the outcomes that will best serve them (Appelbaum & Grisso, 1988; Finucane et al., 2002; Yates & Patalano, 1999; Zwahr, Park, & Shifren, 1999).”
BackgroundAging and attentional biases for emotional faces
Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01455 · Cited by 808
Self-citationChoosing social partners: how old age and anticipated endings make people more selective
Fredrickson, B. L., & Carstensen, L. L. (1990) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.5.3.335 · Cited by 487
Self-citationInfluence of HIV status and age on cognitive representations of others
Carstensen, L. L., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.17.6.494 · Cited by 249
Self-citation
Cited by
Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory
Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005 · Cited by 1,910
Self-citationPhysical activity in older age: perspectives for healthy ageing and frailty
McPhee, J. S., French, D. P., Jackson, D., Nazroo, J., Pendleton, N., & Degens, H. (2016) · Biogerontology · doi:10.1007/s10522-016-9641-0 · Cited by 1,369
At the Intersection of Emotion and Cognition: Aging and the Positivity Effect
Carstensen, L. L., & Mikels, J. A. (2005) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00348.x · Cited by 1,007
Self-citationThe NIH Cognitive and Emotional Health Project: Report of the Critical Evaluation Study Committee
Hendrie, H. C., Albert, M. S., Butters, M. A., Gao, S., Knopman, D. S., Launer, L. J., Yaffe, K., Cuthbert, B. N., Edwards, E., & Wagster, M. V. (2006) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2005.11.004 · Cited by 323
Aging and the HPA axis: Stress and resilience in older adults
Gaffey, A. E., Bergeman, C. S., Clark, L. A., & Wirth, M. M. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.036 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Löckenhoff, C. E., & Carstensen, L. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10-28
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1395-1424
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W1981561047
- Cited by
- 632
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Socioemotional Selectivity Theory, Aging, and Health: The Increasingly Delicate Balance Between Regulating Emotions and Making Tough Choices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00301.x
- The paper
- Löckenhoff, C. E., & Carstensen, L. L. (2004). Socioemotional Selectivity Theory, Aging, and Health: The Increasingly Delicate Balance Between Regulating Emotions and Making Tough Choices. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00301.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
