Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Large‐scale transcriptome analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), an orphan legume crop of the semi‐arid tropics of Asia and Africa

Open access
Hiremath, Pavana J., Farmer, Andrew, Cannon, Steven B., Woodward, Jimmy, Kudapa, Himabindu, Tuteja, Reetu, Kumar, Ashish, BhanuPrakash, Amindala, Mulaosmanovic, Benjamin, Gujaria, Neha, Krishnamurthy, Laxmanan, Gaur, Pooran M., KaviKishor, Polavarapu B., Shah, Trushar, Srinivasan, Ramamurthy, Lohse, Marc, Xiao, Yongli, Town, Christopher D., Cook, Douglas R., May, Gregory D., Varshney, Rajeev K.·2011·Plant Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Summary: Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is an important legume crop in the semi‐arid regions of Asia and Africa. Gains in crop productivity have been low however, particularly because of biotic and abiotic stresses. To help enhance crop productivity using molecular breeding techniques, next generation sequencing technologies such as Roche/454 and Illumina/Solexa were used to determine the sequence of most gene transcripts and to identify drought‐responsive genes and gene‐based molecular markers. A total of 103 215 tentative unique sequences (TUSs) have been produced from 435 018 Roche/454 reads and 21 491 Sanger expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Putative functions were determined for 49 437 (47.8%) of the TUSs, and gene ontology assignments were determined for 20 634 (41.7%) of the TUSs. Comparison of the chickpea TUSs with the Medicago truncatula genome assembly (Mt 3.5.1 build) resulted in 42 141 aligned TUSs with putative gene structures (including 39 281 predicted intron/splice junctions). Alignment of ∼37 million Illumina/Solexa tags generated from drought‐challenged root tissues of two chickpea genotypes against the TUSs identified 44 639 differentially expressed TUSs. The TUSs were also used to identify a diverse set of markers, including 728 simple sequence repeats (SSRs), 495 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 387 conserved orthologous sequence (COS) markers, and 2088 intron‐spanning region (ISR) markers. This resource will be useful for basic and applied research for genome analysis and crop improvement in chickpea.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00625.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Hiremath, P. J., Farmer, A., Cannon, S. B., Woodward, J., Kudapa, H., Tuteja, R., Kumar, A., BhanuPrakash, A., Mulaosmanovic, B., Gujaria, N., Krishnamurthy, L., Gaur, P. M., KaviKishor, P. B., Shah, T., Srinivasan, R., Lohse, M., Xiao, Y., Town, C. D., Cook, D. R., May, G. D., & Varshney, R. K.
Venue
Plant Biotechnology Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-25
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
922-931
ISSN
  • 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7652
OpenAlex
W2119135342
Cited by
268
References
6
FWCI
30.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large‐scale transcriptome analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), an orphan legume crop of the semi‐arid tropics of Asia and Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00625.x
The paper
Hiremath, P. J., Farmer, A., Cannon, S. B., Woodward, J., Kudapa, H., Tuteja, R., Kumar, A., BhanuPrakash, A., Mulaosmanovic, B., Gujaria, N., Krishnamurthy, L., Gaur, P. M., KaviKishor, P. B., Shah, T., Srinivasan, R., Lohse, M., Xiao, Y., Town, C. D., Cook, D. R., . . . Varshney, R. K. (2011). Large‐scale transcriptome analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), an orphan legume crop of the semi‐arid tropics of Asia and Africa. Plant Biotechnology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00625.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.