The DOI matches its Crossref record.
African NGOs: The New Compradors?
Abstract
In the course of the last twenty‐five years, Africa has witnessed an astounding growth in the number and influence of non‐governmental organizations (NGOs) in general, and more recently of African NGOs in particular. Initially, the literature on this was dominated by the concerns of the policy‐making and NGO communities, drawing on liberal pluralist theory. Lately, an independent, critical literature has developed based on substantial empirical research. Its findings make for uncomfortable reading. They document the essential lack of autonomy of local non‐state actors and their very close relationship to Northern governments. This essay argues that the position of NGOs must be theorized within the wider context of the global political economy of the continent. With this in mind, it investigates the rationale for using a comprador perspective to understand the contemporary role of African NGOs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
NGOs, States, and Donors Revisited: Still Too Close for Comfort?
Banks, N., Hulme, D., & Edwards, M. (2015) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.028 · Cited by 772
“Viewed favorably for their ability to connect with beneficiaries and their role as innovators in working with the poor, NGOs became the new “sweethearts” of development (Barr, Fafchamps, & Owens, 2005; Gill, 1997; Hearn, 2007; Kamat, 2004; Lewis, 2005; Murray & Overton, 2011).”
BackgroundNegotiating Statehood: Dynamics of Power and Domination in Africa
Hagmann, T., & Péclard, D. (2010) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01656.x · Cited by 499
Beyond NGO‐ization?: Reflections from Latin America
Alvarez, S. E. (2009) · Development · doi:10.1057/dev.2009.23 · Cited by 375
The Role of NGOs and Civil Society in Development and Poverty Reduction
Banks, N., & Hulme, D. (2012) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2072157 · Cited by 251
Democratic Backsliding in Africa?
(2022) · Oxford University Press · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192867322.001.0001 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Hearn, J.
- Venue
- Development and Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1095-1110
- ISSN
- 0012-155X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7660
- OpenAlex
- W1911719021
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: African NGOs: The New Compradors? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00447.x
- The paper
- Hearn, J. (2007). African NGOs: The New Compradors? Development and Change. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00447.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.