The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Negotiating Statehood: Dynamics of Power and Domination in Africa
Open accessAbstract
This article, which forms the introduction to a collection of studies, focuses on processes of state construction and deconstruction in contemporary Africa. Its objective is to better understand how local, national and transnational actors forge and remake the state through processes of negotiation, contestation and bricolage. Following a critique of the predominant state failure literature and its normative and analytical shortcomings, the authors identify four key arguments of the scholarly literature on the state in Africa, which concern the historicity of the state in Africa, the embeddedness of bureaucratic organizations in society, the symbolic and material dimensions of statehood and the importance of legitimacy. A heuristic framework entitled ‘negotiating statehood’ is proposed, referring to the dynamic and partly undetermined processes of state formation and failure by a multitude of social actors who compete over the institutionalization of power relations. The article then operationalizes this framework in three sections that partly conceptualize, partly illustrate who negotiates statehood in contemporary Africa (actors, resources and repertoires); where these negotiation processes occur (negotiation arenas and tables); and what these processes are all about (objects of negotiation). Empirical examples drawn from a variety of political contexts across the African continent illustrate these propositions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
The Theory of Social and Economic Organization.
Delatour, G. S., Weber, M., Henderson, A. M., & Parsons, T. (1948) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2086579 · Cited by 11,300
Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government
Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/591464 · Cited by 3,218
Political power beyond the State: problematics of government
Rose, N., & Miller, P. (2010) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01247.x · Cited by 3,194
Mbembe, A. (2019) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520917538 · Cited by 2,720
Spatializing States: Toward an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality
Ferguson, J., & Gupta, A. (2002) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.2002.29.4.981 · Cited by 2,680
Strong societies and weak states: state-society relations and state capabilities in the Third World
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-5277 · Cited by 2,625
blurred boundaries: the discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state
GUPTA, A. (1995) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.1995.22.2.02a00090 · Cited by 2,521
Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State (1977)
ABRAMS, P. (1988) · Journal of Historical Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6443.1988.tb00004.x · Cited by 2,463
The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and their Critics
Mitchell, T. (1991) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055400271451 · Cited by 2,336
Cited by
The strength of weak states? Non-state security forces and hybrid governance in Africa
Meagher, K. (2012) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01794.x · Cited by 346
Hybrid Political Order and the Politics of Uncertainty: Refugee Governance in Lebanon
Stel, N. (2020) · doi:10.4324/9780429434716 · Cited by 79
Competing for Control over the State: The Case of Yemen
Clausen, M.-L. (2018) · Small Wars & Insurgencies · doi:10.1080/09592318.2018.1455792 · Cited by 64
Glawion, T., de Vries, L., & Mehler, A. (2019) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/dech.12417 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Hagmann, T., & Péclard, D.
- Venue
- Development and Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 539-562
- ISSN
- 0012-155X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7660
- OpenAlex
- W2125415152
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 80
- FWCI
- 48.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Negotiating Statehood: Dynamics of Power and Domination in Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01656.x
- The paper
- Hagmann, T., & Péclard, D. (2010). Negotiating Statehood: Dynamics of Power and Domination in Africa. Development and Change. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01656.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.