Early bilingualism enhances mechanisms of false‐belief reasoning
Abstract
In their first years, children's understanding of mental states seems to improve dramatically, but the mechanisms underlying these changes are still unclear. Such ‘theory of mind’ (ToM) abilities may arise during development, or have an innate basis, developmental changes reflecting limitations of other abilities involved in ToM tasks (e.g. inhibition). Special circumstances such as early bilingualism may enhance ToM development or other capacities required by ToM tasks. Here we compare 3‐year‐old bilinguals and monolinguals on a standard ToM task, a modified ToM task and a control task involving physical reasoning. The modified ToM task mimicked a language‐switch situation that bilinguals often encounter and that could influence their ToM abilities. If such experience contributes to an early consolidation of ToM in bilinguals, they should be selectively enhanced in the modified task. In contrast, if bilinguals have an advantage due to better executive inhibitory abilities involved in ToM tasks, they should outperform monolinguals on both ToM tasks, inhibitory demands being similar. Bilingual children showed an advantage on the two ToM tasks but not on the control task. The precocious success of bilinguals may be associated with their well‐developed control functions formed during monitoring and selecting languages.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This pattern-bilingual advantage on conflict tasks and no difference on non-conflict tasks-has been replicated in children and adults with flanker, theory of mind, and Simon tasks.
“This pattern has been confirmed in studies of both children and adults using a flanker task (children: [74, 75]), theory of mind task (children: [76, 77]; adults: [78]), Simon task (children: [79]; adults: [44]).”
From Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain (2012) · cites this paper as [77]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ?
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8 · Cited by 8,599 · see citing works
Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control and Children's Theory of Mind
Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00333 · Cited by 2,072 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001 · Cited by 1,386 · see citing works
False-belief understanding in infants
Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M., & He, Z. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.006 · Cited by 1,030 · see citing works
The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience
Bialystok, E. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000099 · Cited by 906 · see citing works
Bilingualism and the development of executive function: The role of attention
Bialystok, E. (2015) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12116 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Which Penguin Is This? Attributing False Beliefs About Object Identity at 18 Months
Scott, R. M., & Baillargeon, R. (2009) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01324.x · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Global–local and trail-making tasks by monolingual and bilingual children: Beyond inhibition.
Bialystok, E. (2010) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015466 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Song, H.-J., Onishi, K. H., Baillargeon, R., & Fisher, C. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.008 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Uljarević, M., Katsos, N., Hudry, K., & Gibson, J. L. (2016) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12596 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kovács, Á. M.
- Affiliations
- Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Kovács, Ágnes Melinda
- Venue
- Developmental Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-22
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-54
- ISSN
- 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7687
- OpenAlex
- W2134153248
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 18.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Research (Auckland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- early bilingualism, theory of mind, false belief reasoning, language switching, executive function, inhibitory control, language monitoring, preschool children, monolingual vs bilingual comparison
- MeSH terms
- Child Development, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Psycholinguistics, Psychological Theory, Speech Perception, Multilingualism, Comprehension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review