The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationship of fruit and vegetable intake with adiposity: a systematic review
Abstract
Summary: Fruit and vegetable (FV) intake has been proposed to protect against obesity. The purpose of this paper was to assess the FV consumption to adiposity relationship. Twenty‐three publications were included. Inclusion criteria: longitudinal or experimental designs; FV intake tested in relation to adiposity; child, adolescent or adult participants; published in English‐language peer‐reviewed journals. Exclusion criteria: dietary pattern and cross‐sectional designs; participants with health concerns. Experimental studies found increased FV consumption (in conjunction with other behaviours) contributed to reduced adiposity among overweight or obese adults, but no association was shown among children. Longitudinal studies among overweight adults found greater F and/or V consumption was associated with slower weight gain, but only half of child longitudinal studies found a significant inverse association. Limitations in methods prevented a thorough examination of the role of increased FV intake alone or mechanisms of effect. An inverse relationship between FV intake and adiposity among overweight adults appears weak; this relationship among children is unclear. Research needs to clarify the nature of, and mechanisms for, the effects of FV consumption on adiposity. Whether increases in FV intake in isolation from lower caloric intake or increased physical activity will result in declines or slower growth in adiposity remains unclear.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Howard, B. V., Manson, J. E., Stefanick, M. L., Beresford, S. A., Frank, G., Jones, B., Rodabough, R. J., Snetselaar, L., Thomson, C., Tinker, L., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.39 · Cited by 426
The Psychosocial and Behavioral Characteristics Related to Energy Misreporting
Maurer, J., Taren, D. L., Teixeira, P. J., Thomson, C. A., Lohman, T. G., Going, S. B., & Houtkooper, L. B. (2006) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2006.tb00188.x · Cited by 244
Svendsen, M., Blomhoff, R., Holme, I., & Tonstad, S. (2007) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602652 · Cited by 67
Why do some overweight children remain overweight, whereas others do not?
Wang, Y., Ge, K., & Popkin, B. M. (2003) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2003470 · Cited by 59
Cited by
Wallace, T. C., Bailey, R. L., Blumberg, J. B., Burton-Freeman, B., Chen, C.-Y. O., Crowe-White, K. M., Drewnowski, A., Hooshmand, S., Johnson, E., Lewis, R., et al. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2019.1632258 · Cited by 638
Evans, C. E., Christian, M. S., Cleghorn, C. L., Greenwood, D. C., & Cade, J. E. (2012) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.111.030270 · Cited by 488
Bertoia, M. L., Mukamal, K. J., Cahill, L. E., Hou, T., Ludwig, D. S., Mozaffarian, D., Willett, W. C., Hu, F. B., & Rimm, E. B. (2015) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001878 · Cited by 397
“Previous prospective studies of fruit and vegetable intake have mixed findings [22].”
BackgroundIncreasing vegetable intakes: rationale and systematic review of published interventions
Appleton, K. M., Hemingway, A., Saulais, L., Dinnella, C., Monteleone, E., Depezay, L., Morizet, D., Armando Perez-Cueto, F. J., Bevan, A., & Hartwell, H. (2016) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-015-1130-8 · Cited by 275
“Associations also suggest a reduced risk of hypertension [7], osteoporosis [8], body weight and adiposity [9, 10], dementia and cognitive decline [11, 12], and some cancers [13–15], although the evidence for cancers is less consistent [1, 3].”
BackgroundGlobal Vegetable Intake and Supply Compared to Recommendations: A Systematic Review
Kalmpourtzidou, A., Eilander, A., & Talsma, E. F. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12061558 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Ledoux, T. A., Hingle, M. D., & Baranowski, T.
- Venue
- Obesity Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-27
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e143-50
- ISSN
- 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-789X
- OpenAlex
- W1567233705
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.