Cited by 191Usability and User Interface DesignEducational Research and MethodsOnline and Blended Learning

Reflecting on the think‐aloud method for evaluating e‐learning

Cotton, Deborah, Gresty, Karen·2006·British Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

E‐learning is increasingly being used in higher education settings, yet research examining how students use e‐resources is frequently limited. Some previous studies have used the think‐aloud method (an approach with origins in cognitive psychology) as an alternative to the more usual questionnaire or focus groups, but there is little discussion in the educational literature about the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. In this paper, we discuss our experience of using the think‐aloud method in a recent study, and we reflect on its potential contribution as a research method. A number of concerns about the method arose during our study, including the level of guidance given to participants, observer influence, and the complexity of data analysis. We conclude, however, that the richness of the data collected outweighs these constraints, and that the think‐aloud method has the potential to enhance research in this field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00521.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Verbal protocol analysis is considered ideal for tracing usability problems in Web applications.

    “We chose this method because it is considered ideal for tracing usability problems in Web applications (Cotton and Gresty, 2006).”

    From Understanding Blind Users' Web Accessibility and Usability Problems (2010) · cites this paper as Cotton and Gresty, 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cotton, D., & Gresty, K.
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-12
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
45-54
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
OpenAlex
W2069754417
Cited by
191
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
think-aloud, e-learning evaluation, higher education, research methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review