Cited by 21Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEducational Technology in Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AI in training (1980–2000): Foundation for the future or misplaced optimism?

Welham, David·2008·British Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

Since the beginning of the use of technology to support training and learning there has always been the belief that such new technologies would be able to add value either by reducing costs or increasing effectiveness. The 1980s and early 1990s were a period of enormous optimism as to the promise that such technology could bring. The governments of Europe and the US were generous in their funding of research in this area. In Europe research and development programmes such as ESPRIT, DELTA, RACE, ERASMUS and COMETT, to name only a few, funded a wealth of initiatives aimed at advancing the use of technology. At the margins of the early initiatives was the belief that AI must have a part to play in these developments. This paper reviews the early initiatives and suggests reasons why the potential for the use of AI in education and training has never been truly fulfilled.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00818.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bierman D. Breuker J.&Sandberg J.(1989).Artificial intelligence and education. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on AI and Education Amsterdam.
  2. 10.1207/s15516709cog0202_4 · DOI
  3. Brown J. S., 1982, Intelligent tutoring systems, 227
  4. Cumming G., 1988, Artificial intelligence applications to learning and training
  5. DELTA, 1991, Final technical report, DELTA: developing European learning through technological advance
  6. Fox J., 1982, Expert systems” state of the art report series
  7. 10.1016/j.eswa.2004.08.003 · DOI
  8. Self J., 1988, Artificial intelligence and human learning
  9. 10.1016/B978-0-08-034097-5.50015-X · DOI
  10. Sleeman D., 1982, Intelligent tutoring systems, 1
  11. Van den Brande L., 1993, Flexible and distance learning—a special report
  12. 10.1016/0360-1315(92)90042-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Welham, D.
Corresponding author
Welham, David
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
287-296
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
OpenAlex
W1973185606
Cited by
21
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
artificial intelligence in training, educational technology, history of artificial intelligence, ESPRIT, Erasmus, race, Delta, government research funding, technology adoption in education, training effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review