Cited by 74Labor Movements and UnionsDisability Education and EmploymentDisability Rights and Representation

Negotiating ‘difference’: Representing disabled employees in the British workplace

Foster, Deborah, Fosh, Patricia·2010·British Journal of Industrial Relations

Abstract

Abstract Drawing on qualitative interviews with disabled employees, union officers and disability‐related organizations, this article examines employee attempts to negotiate workplace adjustments and associated issues of workplace representation. UK employment law utilizes an individual medical model of disability, which conflicts with traditional collective approaches favoured by trade unions, which has implications for disabled employees and union representation. We explore the different strategies available to unions and conclude that, despite the role played by disability‐related organizations in supporting employees, unions are the only workplace actors who are capable of reconfiguring the ‘personal as political’ and integrating disability concerns into wider organizational agendas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00748.x

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foster, D., & Fosh, P.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Venue
British Journal of Industrial Relations
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08-04
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
560-582
ISSN
  • 0007-1080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8543
OpenAlex
W2018491578
Cited by
74
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Industrial Relations (publishedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Labor Movements and Unions
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
disabled workers, workplace adaptation, union representation, trade unions, medical model of disability, labor law, employee representation, disability rights, British workplaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review