The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic Capabilities and Knowledge Management: an Integrative Role for Learning?*
Open accessAbstract
Modern strategic management theories try to explain why firms differ, because new sources of competitive advantage are keenly sought in the dynamic and complex environment of global competition. Two areas in particular have attracted the attention of researchers: the role of dynamic capabilities, and the firm's abilities for knowledge management. In this paper, we argue that there is a link between these two concepts, which has not been fully articulated in the literature. The aim of the paper is therefore to ascertain the conceptual connection between them as a basis for future research. Our proposed framework acknowledges and critiques the distinct roots of each field, identifies boundaries, and proposes relationships between the constructs and firm performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939 · cited 2×
“In particular, the ‘knowledge-based view’ of the firm proposes knowledge as a key resource, and therefore is a development of the resource-based view as a source of competitive advantage (Grant, 1996; Kogut and Zander, 1992).”
BackgroundStrategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425 · cited 1×
“…of tangible and intangible resources and capabilities, and these differences account for variations in organizations’ competitive positions and their performance (Amit and Schoemaker, 1993; Barney, 1991; Penrose, 1959; Peteraf, 1993; Reed and DeFillippi, 1990; Ru-melt, 1984; Wernerfelt, 1984).”
BackgroundUnderstanding dynamic capabilities
Winter, S. G. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.318 · Cited by 5,315
The dynamic resource‐based view: capability lifecycles
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.332 · Cited by 4,553
Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis
He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0078 · Cited by 3,737 · cited 3×
“Aftertwo decades of research on the exploration–exploitation trade-off (Adler, Goldoftas and Levine, 1999; He and Wong, 2004), scholars in organization theory have concluded that the degree of success of business organizations lies in their potential to conduct both exploration and exploitation…”
InfluentialEntrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda
Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x · Cited by 3,152
Cited by
Schilke, O., Hu, S., & Helfat, C. E. (2018) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0014 · Cited by 1,226
Harvey, G., Skelcher, C., Spencer, E., Jas, P., & Walshe, K. (2010) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719030902817923 · Cited by 111
Münter, M. T. (2026) · International Encyclopedia of Business Management · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-13701-3.00203-6 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Easterby‐Smith, M., & Prieto, I. M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235-249
- ISSN
- 1045-3172 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8551
- OpenAlex
- W2138289283
- Cited by
- 625
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 33.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic Capabilities and Knowledge Management: an Integrative Role for Learning?*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00543.x
- The paper
- Easterby‐Smith, M., & Prieto, I. M. (2008). Dynamic Capabilities and Knowledge Management: an Integrative Role for Learning?*. British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00543.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
