The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PEER REINFORCEMENT AND SOCIOMETRIC STATUS
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the relation between peer reinforcement and social status. Data were obtained from 2 classes of preschool children, with repeated measurement of S3 in 1 class. Reinforcement occurring in the peer group was assessed by means of observations; a picture sociometric was used to measure social status. Major findings were: (a) social acceptance (measured in terms of positive choices) was significantly correlated with frequency of giving positive reinforcement but not with frequency of giving negative reinforcement; (b) rejection (negative choices) was significantly correlated with giving negative reinforcement but not with giving positive reinforcement; (c) children received more positive reinforcement from liked peers than from disliked peers; (d) Ss did not receive more negative reinforcement from disliked than liked peers; and (e) more positive than negative reinforcement was received from both liked and disliked peers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Siegel, S. (1957) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1957.10501091 · Cited by 3,903
Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity.
Byrne, D. (1961) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0044721 · Cited by 1,087
The prediction of interpersonal attraction.
Newcomb, T. M. (1956) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0046141 · Cited by 379
POSITIVE SOCIAL REINFORCEMENT IN THE NURSERY SCHOOL PEER GROUP
Charlesworth, R., & Hartup, W. W. (1967) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1967.tb04375.x · Cited by 190
Self-citationA Study in Prediction of Social Behavior of Preschool Children
Marshall, H. R., & McCandless, B. R. (1957) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1125877 · Cited by 99
Sociometric Status of Preschool Children Related to Age, Sex, Nurturance-Giving, and Dependency
Moore, S. G., & Updegraff, R. (1964) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1126715 · Cited by 96
Friendship status and the effectiveness of peers as reinforcing agents
Hartup, W. W. (1964) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-0965(64)90017-7 · Cited by 49
Self-citation
Cited by
Dodge, K. A., Lansford, J. E., Burks, V. S., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., Fontaine, R., & Price, J. M. (2003) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.7402004 · Cited by 933
A Behavioral Analysis of Emerging Social Status in Boys' Groups
Coie, J. D., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1983) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1129803 · Cited by 739
Children's loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status.
Asher, S. R., & Wheeler, V. A. (1985) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.53.4.500 · Cited by 841
Gottman, J. M., & Graziano, W. G. (1983) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1165860 · Cited by 466
Coaching Children in Social Skills for Friendship Making
Oden, S. L., & Asher, S. R. (1977) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1977.tb01189.x · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Hartup, W. W., Glazer, J. A., & Charlesworth, R.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1967-12-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1017-1017
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081215470
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PEER REINFORCEMENT AND SOCIOMETRIC STATUS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1967.tb04377.x
- The paper
- Hartup, W. W., Glazer, J. A., & Charlesworth, R. (1967). PEER REINFORCEMENT AND SOCIOMETRIC STATUS. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1967.tb04377.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
