The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
School Effects on Pupil Progress: Research Findings and Policy Implications
Abstract
RUTTER, MICHAEL. School Effects on Pupil Progress: Research Findings and Policy Implications. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1983, 54, 1-29. Some of the differences in conclusions on whether schooling influences pupil progress have stemmed from the use of difference concepts of school effects. These are reviewed in terms of the proportion of the variance accounted for, the reduction of inequality, and the raising of standards. It is argued that multiple indicators of school effectiveness are required; these should include scholastic attainment, classroom behavior, absenteeism, attitudes to learning, continuation in education, employment, and social functioning. The methodological issues inherent in the determination of school effects in raising standards are reviewed, with an emphasis on the need to control for variations in intake and to determine whether the differences among schools in pupil outcome are attributable to measured features of the schools themselves. It is concluded that there are important school effects that probably represent causal influences. The school features that might be responsible for beneficial effects on pupil progress are reviewed in terms of resources and physical plant, size of school and class, organizational structure, composition of student body, degree of academic emphasis, classroom management, discipline and pupil conditions, pupil participation and responsibility, and staff organization. The policy implications that stem from the research findings are considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement
Jensen, A. (1969) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.39.1.l3u15956627424k7 · Cited by 2,907 · cited 1×
“These pessimistic views were reinforced by Jensen's (1969) claim that "compensatory education has been tried and it apparently has failed"; by Bowles's (1977) assertion that "educational inequalities are rooted in the basic institutions of our economy"; and by Bernstein's (1970) urging that "education cannot compensat…”
BackgroundGALLOWAY, D. (1976) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02984.x · Cited by 48
Cited by
Stanovich, K. E. (1986) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.21.4.1 · Cited by 5,222
Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development
McLoyd, V. C. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.2.185 · Cited by 3,763
A Review of School Climate Research
Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654313483907 · Cited by 2,335
We know some things: parent-adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect
Steinberg, L. (2001) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/1532-7795.00001 · Cited by 2,250
School Climate: Research, Policy, Practice, and Teacher Education
Cohen, J., Mccabe, E. M., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146810911100108 · Cited by 2,049
Metadata
- Authors
- Rutter, M. L.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-02-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017523394
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 81.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.