The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inhibited and Uninhibited Children: A Follow-up Study
Abstract
REZNICK, J. STEVEN; KAGAN, JEROME; SNIDMAN, NANCY; GERSTEN, MICHELLE; BAAK, KATHERINE; and ROSENBERG, ALLISON. Inhibited and Uninhibited Children: A Follow-up Study. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1986, 57, 660-680. A group of 46 children classified at 21 months as either behaviorally inhibited or uninhibited, and 18 children who were classified as falling at neither extreme, were observed at 5 /2years of age in contexts designed to evaluate behavior in social situations and heart rate, heart rate variability, and pupillary dilation to cognitive tasks. Additionally, 43 of the 46 inhibited or uninhibited children had been evaluated in similar contexts when they were 4 years of age. At age 51/, the formerly inhibited children, compared with the uninhibited ones, were more inhibited with peers in both laboratory and school, as well as with an adult examiner in a testing situation, and more cautious in a situation of mild risk. As at the earlier ages, more inhibited children had a relatively high and stable heart rate. The inhibited children also had tonically larger pupillary dilations to cognitive stress, were either impulsive or reflective on a test with response uncertainty, and their mothers described them as shy with unfamiliar peers. It was suggested that one or more of the stress circuits that link the hypothalamus to the pituitary, reticular activating system, and sympathetic chain are at a higher level of excitability among inhibited than among uninhibited children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stress hormones: their interaction and regulation
Axelrod, J., & Reisine, T. D. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6143403 · Cited by 1,527
Charney, D. S. (1984) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790190025003 · Cited by 599
Cited by
Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2007) · Handbook of Child Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0310 · Cited by 2,755
BOYCE, W. T., & ELLIS, B. J. (2005) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579405050145 · Cited by 2,078
Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis.
Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.111.2.256 · Cited by 1,922
Social Withdrawal in Childhood
Rubin, K. H., Coplan, R. J., & Bowker, J. C. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163642 · Cited by 1,503
Behavioral Inhibition: Linking Biology and Behavior within a Developmental Framework
Fox, N. A., Henderson, H. A., Marshall, P. J., Nichols, K. E., & Ghera, M. M. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141532 · Cited by 1,040
Metadata
- Authors
- Steven Reznick, J., Kagan, J., Snidman, N., Gersten, M., Baak, K., & Rosenberg, A.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-06
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 660-680
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8624
- OpenAlex
- W2011769654
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhibited and Uninhibited Children: A Follow-up Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00235.x
- The paper
- Steven Reznick, J., Kagan, J., Snidman, N., Gersten, M., Baak, K., & Rosenberg, A. (1986). Inhibited and Uninhibited Children: A Follow-up Study. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00235.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.