The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Development of Companionship and Intimacy
Abstract
This study is concerned with the development of companionship and intimacy. Subjects in the second, fifth, and eighth grades (mean ages, respectively, 7.5, 10.4, and 13.4) rated the importance and extent of companionship and intimate disclosure experienced in social life in general and in each of 8 types of relationships. Companionship was perceived as a desired social provision at all 3 grade levels. Family members were important providers of companionship for children in the second and fifth grades, but they became significantly less so in the eighth grade. Same-sex peers were important providers across all 3 grades, and they became increasingly important as children grew older. Opposite-sex peers did not become important as companions until the eighth grade. Counter to expectations, there were no age differences in the global desire for intimacy. Parents were important providers of intimate disclosure for the youngest children, but they were less important among the younger adolescents. There was mixed support for the hypothesis that same-sex friends become important providers of intimacy during preadolescence. Findings were different for boys and girls, suggesting that girls seek intimate disclosure in friendship at younger ages than boys do.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Children's perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks.
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037//0012-1649.21.6.1016 · Cited by 2,338
Self-citationThe ecology of adolescent activity and experience
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., & Prescott, S. (1977) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/bf02138940 · Cited by 781
Changes in functions of three relations during adolescence.
Hunter, F. T., & Youniss, J. (1982) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.18.6.806 · Cited by 235
Cited by
Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2007) · Handbook of Child Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0310 · Cited by 2,755
Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98 · Cited by 2,517
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654311421793 · Cited by 2,370
Social Anxiety among Adolescents: Linkages with Peer Relations and Friendships
La Greca, A. M., & Lopez, N. (1998) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1022684520514 · Cited by 1,656
Age and Sex Differences in Perceptions of Networks of Personal Relationships
Furman, W. C., & Buhrmester, D. (1992) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb03599.x · Cited by 1,645
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Buhrmester, D., & Furman, W. C.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-08
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1101
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021233468
- Cited by
- 926
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Development of Companionship and Intimacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1987.tb01444.x
- The paper
- Buhrmester, D., & Furman, W. C. (1987). The Development of Companionship and Intimacy. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1987.tb01444.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.