The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Infants' Preference for the Predominant Stress Patterns of English Words
Open accessAbstract
One critical aspect of language acquisition is the development of a lexicon that associates sounds and meanings; but developing a lexicon first requires that the infant segment utterances into individual words. How might the infant begin this process? The present study was designed to examine the potential role that sensitivity to predominant stress patterns of words might play in lexical development. In English, by far the majority of words have stressed (strong) initial syllables. Experiment 1 of our study demonstrated that by 9 months of age American infants listen significantly longer to words with strong/weak stress patterns than to words with weak/strong stress patterns. However, Experiment 2 showed that no significant preferences for the predominant stress pattern appear with 6-month-old infants, which suggests that the preference develops as a result of increasing familiarity with the prosodic features of the native language. In a third experiment, 9-month-olds showed a preference for strong/weak patterns even when the speech input was low-pass filtered, which suggests that their preference is specifically for the prosodic structure of the words. Together the results suggest that attention to predominant stress patterns in the native language may form an important part of the infant's process of developing a lexicon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80022-3 · Cited by 2,801 · cited 1×
“For example, Werker and her colleagues (Werker & Lalonde, 1988; Werker & Tees, 1984) have documented a decline in sensitivity during the latter half of the first year of life by infants from English-speaking homes to certain phonetic contrasts not found in English (but see also Best, McRoberts, &…”
BackgroundFour-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese
Fernald, A. (1985) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(85)80005-9 · Cited by 1,015
Preference for infant‐directed speech in the first month after birth
Cooper, R. P., & Aslin, R. N. (1990) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1130766 · Cited by 859
Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech
Fernald, A., & Kuhl, P. (1987) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/0163-6383(87)90017-8 · Cited by 818
Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change.
Werker, J. F., & Lalonde, C. E. (1988) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.5.672 · Cited by 607
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.345 · Cited by 400
A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition
Luce, P. A. (1986) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212485 · Cited by 206
Discrimination of polysyllabic sequences by one- to four-month-old infants
Karzon, R. G. (1985) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-0965(85)90044-x · Cited by 167
Cited by
Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults
Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00075-4 · Cited by 1,429
Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants
Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L. (1998) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00063 · Cited by 1,189
Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants
Kuhl, P. K., Andruski, J. E., Chistovich, I. A., Chistovich, L. A., Kozhevnikova, E. V., Ryskina, V. L., Stolyarova, E. I., Sundberg, U., & Lacerda, F. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5326.684 · Cited by 1,041
Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months
Kuhl, P. K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S., & Iverson, P. (2006) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00468.x · Cited by 867
A new view of language acquisition
Kuhl, P. K. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.22.11850 · Cited by 773
Metadata
- Authors
- Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A., & Redanz, N. J.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-06-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 675-675
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124973255
- Cited by
- 982
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 38.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infants' Preference for the Predominant Stress Patterns of English Words. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02935.x
- The paper
- Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A., & Redanz, N. J. (1993). Infants' Preference for the Predominant Stress Patterns of English Words. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02935.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
