Cited by 1,189Language Development and DisordersPhonetics and Phonology ResearchReading and Literacy Development

Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants

Aslin, Richard N., Saffran, Jenny R., Newport, Elissa L.·1998·Psychological Science

Abstract

A recent report demonstrated that 8-month-olds can segment a continuous stream of speech syllables, containing no acoustic or prosodic cues to word boundaries, into wordlike units after only 2 min of listening experience (Saffran, Aslin, & Newport, 1996). Thus, a powerful learning mechanism capable of extracting statistical information from fluent speech is available early in development. The present study extends these results by documenting the particular type of statistical computation—transitional (conditional) probability—used by infants to solve this word-segmentation task. An artificial language corpus, consisting of a continuous stream of trisyllabic nonsense words, was presented to 8-month-olds for 3 min. A postfamiliarization test compared the infants' responses to words versus part-words (trisyllabic sequences spanning word boundaries). The corpus was constructed so that test words and part-words were matched in frequency, but differed in their transitional probabilities. Infants showed reliable discrimination of words from part-words, thereby demonstrating rapid segmentation of continuous speech into words on the basis of transitional probabilities of syllable pairs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9280.00063

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This learning process was based on the computation of the conditional probabilities of successive syllables, rather than a simpler computation of the frequencies of syllable co-occurrences.

    “An additional experiment confirmed that this learning process was based on the computation of the conditional probabilities of successive syllables, rather than a simpler computation of the frequencies of syllable co-occurrences (Aslin et al., 1998).”

    From Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults (1999) · cites this paper as Aslin et al., 1998

  • The basis for infants' ability to discriminate words from part-words in tone sequences is likely to reside in the same sorts of probability computations between speech sounds discussed by Saffran and colleagues.

    “The basis for infants' ability to discriminate words from part-words in tone sequences, therefore, is likely to reside in the same sorts of probability computations between speech sounds discussed by Saffran and colleagues (Saffran et al., 1996a(Saffran et al., ,b, 1997)), and directly tested by Aslin et al. (1998).”

    From Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults (1999) · cites this paper as Aslin et al. (1998)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester
  • University of Rochester (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
1998-07
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
321-324
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2115197214
Cited by
1,189
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 41
FWCI
27.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
transition probabilities, conditional probability, statistical learning, speech perception, artificial languages, nonsense words, infant language acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review