The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Children's Representations of Attachment Relationships in Family Drawings
Abstract
Children's representational models of self and attachment figures were investigated in family drawings at age 8-9 in a high-risk, racially mixed sample. Drawings were scored using a series of specific signs and a group of theoretically derived, global rating scales. When specific signs were treated in a combined way (versus separately), they were significantly related to early attachment history in predicted ways. Similarly, specific rating scales were found to be significantly related to early relationship history. Analyses exploring the relative contributions of early attachment history and contemporary measures of child IQ, life stress, and emotional functioning revealed that even after contemporary influences were taken into account, attachment history made a significant contribution to the prediction of negative drawing outcome. Results were interpreted as supporting an organizational perspective on development where qualitative differences in early relationships are hypothesized to shape core representational models of the self and to exert an ongoing influence on later representational processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · doi:10.1097/00004583-199109000-00043 · Cited by 1,085
Cited by
The Relationship Context of Human Behavior and Development
Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A., & Berscheid, E. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.844 · Cited by 853
Understanding Illness: Using Drawings as a Research Method
Guillemin, M. (2004) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732303260445 · Cited by 503
Parental and Child Cognitions in the Context of the Family
Bugental, D. B., & Johnston, C. (2000) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.315 · Cited by 387
A prospective investigation of the development of borderline personality symptoms
Carlson, E. A., Egeland, B., & Sroufe, L. A. (2009) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579409990174 · Cited by 332
Self-citationGreen, J., & Goldwyn, R. (2002) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00102 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Fury, G., Carlson, E. A., & Sroufe, L. A.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-06-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1154-1154
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4249115301
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Children's Representations of Attachment Relationships in Family Drawings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01991.x
- The paper
- Fury, G., Carlson, E. A., & Sroufe, L. A. (1997). Children's Representations of Attachment Relationships in Family Drawings. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01991.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.