Understanding Illness: Using Drawings as a Research Method
Abstract
Visual methodologies are becoming more evident in social research. These methodologies encompass media such as film, video, still photography, electronic visual media, and material artifacts. In this article, the author examines the use of drawings as a research tool used as an adjunct to other social research methods. Using examples from two studies, she illustrates how drawings can be used to explore the ways in which people understand illness conditions. She argues that the act of drawing necessitates knowledge production, with a visual product as its outcome. Although the examples presented in this article are limited to illness conditions, she argues that drawings offer a rich and insightful research method to explore how people make sense of their world.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Drawing as a research tool is often complemented by verbal research methods that encourage collaborative meaning-making and allow the drawer to give voice to what the drawing was intended to convey.
“As such, drawing as a research tool is often complemented by verbal research methods (Guillemin, 2004) that encourage collaborative meaning-making that allows the drawer to give voice to what the drawing was intended to convey.”
From Drawings as Research Method (2011) · cites this paper as Guillemin, 2004
When drawing is used as a research method, it often entails participants' drawing and talking or drawing and writing about the meaning embedded in their drawing.
“When drawing is used as a research method, it often entails participants' drawing and talking or drawing and writing (Backett-Milburn & McKie, 1999; Guillemin, 2004; MacGregor et al., 1998; Mair & Kierans, 2007) about the meaning embedded in their drawing.”
From Drawings as Research Method (2011) · cites this paper as Guillemin, 2004
The benefits of using drawings include active engagement of children and adults and visible proof of research findings.
“the benefits of the uses of drawings, as the various chapters in this volume attest, are many and include the active engagement of children (MacGregor et al., 1998) and adults (Guillemin, 2004; Stuart, 2007; Theron, 2008) and visible proof of research findings.”
From Drawings as Research Method (2011) · cites this paper as Guillemin, 2004
For a number of decades, psychologists and researchers have engaged children and adults in draw-and-write or draw-and-talk techniques that have facilitated rich exploration of children's and adults' reflections, perceptions, and views on multiple topics and phenomena.
“For a number of decades-possibly from as early as 1935 (MacGregor, Currie, & Wetton, 1998)-psychologists and researchers have engaged children and adults in activities using varied forms of a 'draw-and-write' or 'draw-and-talk' technique that have facilitated the rich exploration of children's and adults' reflections, perceptions, and views on multiple topics and phenomena”
From Drawings as Research Method (2011) · cites this paper as Guillemin, 2004
Cites
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mitchell, C., Theron, L., Stuart, J., Smith, A., & Campbell, Z. (2011) · Picturing Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-596-3_2 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
“It’s gym, like g-y-m not J-i-m”: Exploring the role of place in the gendering of physical activity
Coen, S. E., Rosenberg, M. W., & Davidson, J. (2018) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.036 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Ask us too! Doing participatory research with disabled children in the global south
Wickenden, M., & Kembhavi-Tam, G. (2014) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/0907568214525426 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Coen, S. E., Davidson, J., & Rosenberg, M. W. (2020) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.12347 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Benza, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2017) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.12.011 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Guillemin, M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Guillemin, Marilys
- ORCID
- Guillemin, Marilys
- Venue
- Qualitative Health Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 272-289
- ISSN
- 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7557
- OpenAlex
- W2135980555
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 17.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
- Keywords
- visual methods, illness experience, knowledge production, sensemaking
- MeSH terms
- Art, Attitude to Health, Female, Heart Diseases, Humans, Middle Aged, Projective Techniques, Self Concept
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review