Cited by 503Participatory Visual Research MethodsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsArtistic and Creative Research

Understanding Illness: Using Drawings as a Research Method

Guillemin, Marilys·2004·Qualitative Health Research

Abstract

Visual methodologies are becoming more evident in social research. These methodologies encompass media such as film, video, still photography, electronic visual media, and material artifacts. In this article, the author examines the use of drawings as a research tool used as an adjunct to other social research methods. Using examples from two studies, she illustrates how drawings can be used to explore the ways in which people understand illness conditions. She argues that the act of drawing necessitates knowledge production, with a visual product as its outcome. Although the examples presented in this article are limited to illness conditions, she argues that drawings offer a rich and insightful research method to explore how people make sense of their world.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049732303260445

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drawing as a research tool is often complemented by verbal research methods that encourage collaborative meaning-making and allow the drawer to give voice to what the drawing was intended to convey.

    “As such, drawing as a research tool is often complemented by verbal research methods (Guillemin, 2004) that encourage collaborative meaning-making that allows the drawer to give voice to what the drawing was intended to convey.”

    From Drawings as Research Method (2011) · cites this paper as Guillemin, 2004

  • When drawing is used as a research method, it often entails participants' drawing and talking or drawing and writing about the meaning embedded in their drawing.

    “When drawing is used as a research method, it often entails participants' drawing and talking or drawing and writing (Backett-Milburn & McKie, 1999; Guillemin, 2004; MacGregor et al., 1998; Mair & Kierans, 2007) about the meaning embedded in their drawing.”

    From Drawings as Research Method (2011) · cites this paper as Guillemin, 2004

  • The benefits of using drawings include active engagement of children and adults and visible proof of research findings.

    “the benefits of the uses of drawings, as the various chapters in this volume attest, are many and include the active engagement of children (MacGregor et al., 1998) and adults (Guillemin, 2004; Stuart, 2007; Theron, 2008) and visible proof of research findings.”

    From Drawings as Research Method (2011) · cites this paper as Guillemin, 2004

  • For a number of decades, psychologists and researchers have engaged children and adults in draw-and-write or draw-and-talk techniques that have facilitated rich exploration of children's and adults' reflections, perceptions, and views on multiple topics and phenomena.

    “For a number of decades-possibly from as early as 1935 (MacGregor, Currie, & Wetton, 1998)-psychologists and researchers have engaged children and adults in activities using varied forms of a 'draw-and-write' or 'draw-and-talk' technique that have facilitated the rich exploration of children's and adults' reflections, perceptions, and views on multiple topics and phenomena”

    From Drawings as Research Method (2011) · cites this paper as Guillemin, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guillemin, M.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Guillemin, Marilys
Venue
Qualitative Health Research
Published
2004-02
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
272-289
ISSN
  • 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7557
OpenAlex
W2135980555
Cited by
503
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 20
FWCI
17.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
Keywords
visual methods, illness experience, knowledge production, sensemaking
MeSH terms
Art, Attitude to Health, Female, Heart Diseases, Humans, Middle Aged, Projective Techniques, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review