Cited by 217Action Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Perception in Infancy: A Near Infrared Spectroscopy Study

Open access
Lloyd-Fox, Sarah, Blasi, Anna, Volein, Agnes, Everdell, Nick, Elwell, Claire E, Johnson, Mark H·2009·Child Development

Abstract

The capacity to engage and communicate in a social world is one of the defining characteristics of the human species. While the network of regions that compose the social brain have been the subject of extensive research in adults, there are limited techniques available for monitoring young infants. This study used near infrared spectroscopy to investigate functional activation in the social brain network of 36 five-month-old infants. We measured the hemodynamic responses to visually presented stimuli in the temporal lobes. A significant increase in oxyhemoglobin was localized to 2 posterior temporal sites bilaterally, indicating that these areas are involved in the social brain network in young infants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01312.x

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 217

Metadata

Authors
Lloyd-Fox, S., Blasi, A., Volein, A., Everdell, N., Elwell, C. E., & Johnson, M. H.
Affiliations
  • University of London
  • University College London (GB)
  • University College London
  • University of London (GB)
Venue
Child Development
Published
2009-07-01
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
986-999
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W1971796999
Cited by
217
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
social perception, infancy, social brain network, posterior temporal lobe, oxyhemoglobin, hemodynamic response, visual stimuli
MeSH terms
Cerebrovascular Circulation, Female, Hemodynamics, Humans, Infant, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Temporal Lobe, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review