Cited by 722Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Animal Learning Development

Interactive Specialization: A domain-general framework for human functional brain development?

Open access
Johnson, Mark H.·2011·Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

A domain-general framework for interpreting data on human functional brain development is presented. Assumptions underlying the general theory and predictions derived from it are discussed. Developmental functional neuroimaging data from the domains of face processing, social cognition, word learning and reading, executive control, and brain resting states are used to assess these predictions. Finally, potential criticisms of the framework are addressed and challenges for the future presented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dcn.2010.07.003

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There may be an age-related increase in the specificity of the different striatal tracts.

    “In line with the interactive specialization account of neurodevelopment (69), this suggests that there may be an age-related increase in the specificity of the different striatal tracts.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Karmiloff-Smith, A., 2009. Nativism vs Neuroconstructivism: rethinking developmental disorders. Dev. Psychol. 45 (1), 56-63.
  2. Mosconi, M.W., Mack, P.B., McCarthy, G., Pelphrey, K.A., 2005. Taking an "intentional stance" on eye-gaze shifts: A functional neuroimaging study. Neuroimage 27 (1), 247-252.
  3. Springer, J.A., Binder, J.R., Hammeke, T.A., Swanson, S.J., Frost, J.A., Bellgo- wan, P.S., Brewer, C.C., Perry, H.M., Morris, G.L., Mueller, W.M., 1999. Language domiance in neuroligically normal and epilepsy subjects: a functional MRI study. Brain 122, 2033-2046.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, M. H.
Affiliations
Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Mark H.
Venue
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
7-21
ISSN
1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024274726
Cited by
722
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 22
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
UK Medical Research Council (G0701484)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
functional brain development, face processing, social cognition, word learning, reading, executive function, resting state
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Humans, Nerve Net, Social Behavior, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review