The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women Directors on Corporate Boards: A Review and Research Agenda
Abstract
Manuscript Type: Review Research Question/Issue: This review examines how gender diversity on corporate boards influences corporate governance outcomes that in turn impact performance. We describe extant research on theoretical perspectives, characteristics, and impact of women on corporate boards (WOCB) at micro, meso, and macro levels: individual, board, firm, and industry/environment. Research Finding/Results: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive review of WOCBs, incorporating and integrating research from over 400 publications in psychology, sociology, leadership, gender, finance, management, law, corporate governance, and entrepreneurship domains. In addition, we organized our findings to provide a new lens enabling the field to be readily examined by level and by theoretical perspective. The review indicates that WOCB research is about improving corporate governance through better use of the whole talent pool's capital, as well as about building more inclusive and fairer business institutions that better reflect their present generation of stakeholders. Theoretical Implications: With only one in 10 papers addressing theoretical development, the predominant perspectives are human and social capital theories and gender schema at the individual level; social identity, token, and social networks theories at board level; resource dependency, institution, and agency theories at the firm level; and institutional, critical, and political theories at the environmental level. We provide a short synopsis of findings at each level, and conclude with an outline of fruitful directions for future research. Practical Implications: There are increasing pressures for WOCBs from diverse stakeholders, such as the European Commission, national governments, politicians, employer lobby groups, shareholders, Fortune and FTSE rankings, best places for women to work lists, as well as expectations from highly qualified women who are likely to leave if they see no women board members. Rationales generally draw on the business case; however, the moral justice case is also used by those who seek a fairer gender balance in all aspects of society. From our review, the “Impact” section charts the effect of WOCB at all four levels of analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: the implied communality deficit
Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81 · Cited by 999
Cited by
Female Directors and Earnings Quality*
SRINIDHI, B., GUL, F. A., & TSUI, J. (2011) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01071.x · Cited by 1,312
The Contribution of Women on Boards of Directors: Going beyond the Surface
Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010) · Corporate Governance: An International Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00784.x · Cited by 1,162
The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms
McGuinness, P. B., Vieito, J. P., & Wang, M. (2017) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.001 · Cited by 939
Board Composition Beyond Independence: Social Capital, Human Capital, and Demographics
Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312463938 · Cited by 616
Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: evidence from the USA
Manita, R., Bruna, M. G., Dang, R., & Houanti, L. (2018) · Journal of Applied Accounting Research · doi:10.1108/jaar-01-2017-0024 · Cited by 601
Metadata
- Authors
- Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V.
- Venue
- Corporate Governance: An International Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 320-337
- ISSN
- 0964-8410 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8683
- OpenAlex
- W2070970562
- Cited by
- 1,680
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 78.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women Directors on Corporate Boards: A Review and Research Agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x
- The paper
- Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women Directors on Corporate Boards: A Review and Research Agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.