The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Governance Bundles, Firm Performance, and the Substitutability and Complementarity of Governance Mechanisms
Abstract
Manuscript Type: Conceptual Research Question/Issue: This paper extends the theory of bundles of corporate governance mechanisms to address agency issues within the Anglo‐Saxon system of corporate governance. The focus of our study is to detail the role of firm performance as a key determinant of how the governance mechanisms of monitoring and incentive alignment serve as complements or substitutes in addressing agency issues. Previous research has looked at these mechanisms in isolation from each other, with limited regard for the contingencies of firm performance and external monitoring. We propose that it is best to look at these mechanisms as a bundle of mechanisms to protect shareholder interests, and that firm performance is a key determinant of the composition of this bundle. Research Findings/Insights: We introduce firm performance as a critical contingency that heightens shareholders' concerns over governance issues as they seek to retain control over adverse selection and moral hazard problems. We propose that when firms are performing poorly, outside monitoring by institutional investors can complement internal monitoring by boards of directors. Theoretical/Academic Implications: We examine governance bundles under both agency and stewardship theoretical lenses to tie together previous empirical research and advance theory. In specifying the role of firm performance in determining the mix of mechanisms within the governance bundle, we reconcile prior disparate findings as to whether or not these governance mechanisms act in a complementary or substitutable fashion. Practitioner/Policy Implications: The conceptualization of these governance mechanisms has practitioner merit in analyzing the challenges that board members face managing agency conflicts through the mix of governance mechanisms, given different levels of firm performance. Our research also shows that, under conditions of poor performance, shareholders can provide effective external monitoring that can improve the overall governance effectiveness of the firm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
A Survey of Corporate Governance
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x · Cited by 16,243
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
Cited by
Khatib, S. F. A., Abdullah, D. F., Elamer, A. A., & Abueid, R. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2665 · Cited by 322
Board Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Meta-Analytic Investigation
Endrikat, J., de Villiers, C., Guenther, T. W., & Guenther, E. M. (2021) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650320930638 · Cited by 319
Corporate Governance Codes: A Review and Research Agenda
Cuomo, F., Mallin, C., & Zattoni, A. (2016) · Corporate Governance: An International Review · doi:10.1111/corg.12148 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Ward, A. J., Brown, J. A., & Rodriguez, D.
- Venue
- Corporate Governance: An International Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 646-660
- ISSN
- 0964-8410 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8683
- OpenAlex
- W2001672374
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Governance Bundles, Firm Performance, and the Substitutability and Complementarity of Governance Mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00766.x
- The paper
- Ward, A. J., Brown, J. A., & Rodriguez, D. (2009). Governance Bundles, Firm Performance, and the Substitutability and Complementarity of Governance Mechanisms. Corporate Governance: An International Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00766.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.